PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISVL vs. XSVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISVL vs. XSVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF (ISVL) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISVL achieves a 8.45% return, which is significantly lower than XSVM's 16.87% return.


ISVL

1D
-1.11%
1M
2.16%
YTD
8.45%
6M
12.58%
1Y
28.37%
3Y*
21.34%
5Y*
10.07%
10Y*

XSVM

1D
-1.47%
1M
1.71%
YTD
16.87%
6M
16.68%
1Y
34.73%
3Y*
15.99%
5Y*
6.37%
10Y*
12.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISVL vs. XSVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ISVL
iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF
8.45%42.84%4.58%17.56%-13.69%7.69%
XSVM
Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF
16.87%7.47%2.30%20.20%-13.63%14.65%

Correlation

The correlation between ISVL and XSVM is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2021

0.65

The correlation between ISVL and XSVM shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.65 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ISVL vs. XSVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ISVL
XSVM

Industrials

23.3%
6.7%

Financial Services

20.8%
38.8%

Real Estate

11.1%
5.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.4%
17.0%

Basic Materials

9.1%
1.9%

Energy

7.3%
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

5.3%
7.3%

Technology

4.7%
7.8%

Healthcare

3.7%
1.4%

Communication Services

3.0%
2.9%

Utilities

1.5%
1.3%

Industrials

ISVL
23.3%
XSVM
6.7%

Financial Services

ISVL
20.8%
XSVM
38.8%

Real Estate

ISVL
11.1%
XSVM
5.0%

Consumer Cyclical

ISVL
10.4%
XSVM
17.0%

Basic Materials

ISVL
9.1%
XSVM
1.9%

Energy

ISVL
7.3%
XSVM
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

ISVL
5.3%
XSVM
7.3%

Technology

ISVL
4.7%
XSVM
7.8%

Healthcare

ISVL
3.7%
XSVM
1.4%

Communication Services

ISVL
3.0%
XSVM
2.9%

Utilities

ISVL
1.5%
XSVM
1.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISVL vs. XSVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISVL
ISVL Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
ISVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISVL Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
ISVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISVL Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

XSVM
XSVM Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
XSVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSVM Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
XSVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSVM Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISVL vs. XSVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF (ISVL) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ISVLXSVMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.33

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

3.46

-1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.95

10.66

-1.70

ISVL vs. XSVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISVL Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the XSVM Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISVL and XSVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ISVLXSVMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98

1.88

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.28

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.36

+0.33

Drawdowns

ISVL vs. XSVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISVL drawdown since its inception was -30.48%, smaller than the maximum XSVM drawdown of -62.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISVL and XSVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISVLXSVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.48%

-62.57%

+32.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.48%

-10.08%

-2.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.93%

-26.21%

+13.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.48%

-26.21%

-4.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.16%

-1.47%

-0.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.66%

-11.57%

+4.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.18%

3.27%

-0.09%

Volatility

ISVL vs. XSVM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF (ISVL) is 4.54%, while Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) has a volatility of 5.24%. This indicates that ISVL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISVLXSVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.54%

5.24%

-0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.01%

12.05%

-0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.47%

18.59%

-4.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.90%

22.71%

-5.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.78%

25.09%

-8.31%

ISVL vs. XSVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISVL has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than XSVM's 0.37% expense ratio.


Dividends

ISVL vs. XSVM - Dividend Comparison

ISVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, more than XSVM's 1.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ISVL
iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF
2.48%2.69%3.92%3.82%3.37%2.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XSVM
Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF
1.81%2.29%1.69%1.31%1.79%1.23%1.21%1.22%2.54%1.90%2.29%2.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


ISVL and XSVM have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XSVM has higher volatility (5.24%) compared to ISVL (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISVL dropped -30.48% vs XSVM's -62.57%.

On 5-year performance, ISVL leads with 10.07% vs 6.37% for XSVM. On fees, ISVL is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, ISVL has been the lower-risk option at 4.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ISVL has performed better with a 10.07% return vs 6.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ISVL is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for XSVM.

ISVL has the higher dividend yield at 2.48%, compared with 1.81% for XSVM.

ISVL is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while XSVM is Momentum. ISVL tracks FTSE Developed ex US ex Korea Small Cap Focused Value Index, while XSVM tracks S&P SmallCap 600 High Momentum Value Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for ISVL and 0.37% for XSVM.

ISVL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISVL and XSVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer