PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISRG vs. SLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISRG vs. SLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISRG achieves a -27.42% return, which is significantly lower than SLV's -4.86% return. Over the past 10 years, ISRG has outperformed SLV with an annualized return of 19.09%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively lower 13.99% annualized return.


ISRG

1D
-0.45%
1M
-4.91%
YTD
-27.42%
6M
-24.20%
1Y
-19.87%
3Y*
9.23%
5Y*
7.37%
10Y*
19.09%

SLV

1D
0.77%
1M
-22.76%
YTD
-4.86%
6M
9.25%
1Y
85.39%
3Y*
41.27%
5Y*
18.83%
10Y*
13.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISRG vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ISRG
Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
-27.42%8.51%54.72%27.14%-26.15%31.76%38.39%23.43%31.23%72.64%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
-4.86%144.66%20.89%-1.09%2.37%-12.45%47.30%14.88%-9.19%5.82%

Correlation

The correlation between ISRG and SLV is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2006

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISRG vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISRG
ISRG Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
ISRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISRG Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
ISRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISRG Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

SLV
SLV Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISRG vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ISRGSLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.29

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.62

1.89

-2.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.24

4.10

-5.35

ISRG vs. SLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISRG Sharpe Ratio is -0.65, which is lower than the SLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISRG and SLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ISRG vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISRG drawdown since its inception was -82.26%, which is greater than SLV's maximum drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISRG and SLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISRGSLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.26%

-76.28%

-5.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.14%

-45.40%

+13.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.10%

-45.40%

+11.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.90%

-45.40%

-4.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.90%

-45.40%

-4.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.66%

-41.96%

+9.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.28%

-44.66%

+23.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.00%

20.88%

-4.88%

Volatility

ISRG vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG) is 9.70%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 16.34%. This indicates that ISRG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISRGSLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.70%

16.34%

-6.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.72%

59.10%

-38.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.69%

59.82%

-29.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.19%

36.46%

-3.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.40%

32.00%

+0.40%

Dividends

ISRG vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison

Neither ISRG nor SLV has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ISRG and SLV have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLV has higher volatility (16.34%) compared to ISRG (9.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISRG dropped -82.26% vs SLV's -76.28%.

SLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISRG and SLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer