ISRG vs. MU
ISRG (Intuitive Surgical, Inc.) and MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) are both stocks. ISRG operates in Medical Instruments & Supplies (Healthcare), while MU operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 10 years, ISRG returned 16.51%/yr vs 52.40%/yr for MU. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ISRG vs. MU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISRG achieves a -37.64% return, which is significantly lower than MU's 203.41% return. Over the past 10 years, ISRG has underperformed MU with an annualized return of 16.51%, while MU has yielded a comparatively higher 52.40% annualized return.
ISRG
- 1D
- 2.24%
- 1M
- -13.18%
- 6M
- -33.99%
- YTD
- -37.64%
- 1Y
- -31.90%
- 3Y*
- 1.61%
- 5Y*
- 2.32%
- 10Y*
- 16.51%
- ALL TIME*
- 21.90%
MU
- 1D
- 1.94%
- 1M
- -23.67%
- 6M
- 138.72%
- YTD
- 203.41%
- 1Y
- 657.80%
- 3Y*
- 137.11%
- 5Y*
- 62.98%
- 10Y*
- 52.40%
- ALL TIME*
- 17.23%
ISRG vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISRG Intuitive Surgical, Inc. | -37.64% | 8.51% | 54.72% | 27.14% | -26.15% | 31.76% | 38.39% | 23.43% | 31.23% | 72.64% |
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 203.41% | 240.24% | -0.96% | 71.93% | -45.93% | 24.21% | 39.79% | 69.49% | -22.84% | 87.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISRG and MU is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2000 | 0.31 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ISRG and MU has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.31, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
ISRG:
$125.08B
MU:
$977.44B
ISRG:
$8.72
MU:
$44.42
ISRG:
40.52
MU:
19.48
ISRG:
2.48
MU:
0.07
ISRG:
11.53
MU:
10.89
ISRG:
6.92
MU:
9.81
ISRG:
$11.03B
MU:
$90.27B
ISRG:
$7.36B
MU:
$65.51B
ISRG:
$4.18B
MU:
$44.96B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISRG vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank
ISRG
MU
ISRG vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ISRG | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -9.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 1.66 | -0.82 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.77 | 21.93 | -22.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.77 | 74.09 | -75.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ISRG vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISRG drawdown since its inception was -82.26%, smaller than the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISRG and MU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISRG | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.26% | -98.25% | +15.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.74% | -30.28% | -11.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.42% | -57.63% | +14.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.90% | -57.63% | +7.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.90% | -57.63% | +7.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.15% | -28.67% | -13.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.33% | -58.05% | +36.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.06% | 8.95% | +9.11% |
Volatility
ISRG vs. MU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG) is 19.26%, while Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a volatility of 30.97%. This indicates that ISRG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISRG | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.26% | 30.97% | -11.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.17% | 63.14% | -35.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.38% | 76.55% | -41.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.17% | 55.01% | -20.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.87% | 50.78% | -17.91% |
Dividends
ISRG vs. MU - Dividend Comparison
ISRG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISRG Intuitive Surgical, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 0.06% | 0.16% | 0.55% | 0.54% | 0.89% | 0.21% |
Financials
ISRG vs. MU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Micron Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ISRG vs. MU - Profitability Comparison
ISRG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Intuitive Surgical, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.96B and revenue of 2.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.8%.
MU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 35.06B and revenue of 41.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.6%.
ISRG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Intuitive Surgical, Inc. reported an operating income of 971.90M and revenue of 2.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 33.6%.
MU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 33.31B and revenue of 41.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 80.4%.
ISRG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Intuitive Surgical, Inc. reported a net income of 818.10M and revenue of 2.89B, resulting in a net margin of 28.3%.
MU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 28.24B and revenue of 41.46B, resulting in a net margin of 68.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ISRG and MU have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MU has higher volatility (30.97%) compared to ISRG (19.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISRG dropped -82.26% vs MU's -98.25%.
MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.69 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ISRG and MU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer