PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISRG vs. IWM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISRG vs. IWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISRG achieves a -27.42% return, which is significantly lower than IWM's 19.22% return. Over the past 10 years, ISRG has outperformed IWM with an annualized return of 19.09%, while IWM has yielded a comparatively lower 11.27% annualized return.


ISRG

1D
-0.45%
1M
-2.39%
YTD
-27.42%
6M
-24.20%
1Y
-19.74%
3Y*
9.23%
5Y*
7.37%
10Y*
19.09%

IWM

1D
0.87%
1M
5.53%
YTD
19.22%
6M
16.00%
1Y
41.75%
3Y*
17.23%
5Y*
6.07%
10Y*
11.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISRG vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ISRG
Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
-27.42%8.51%54.72%27.14%-26.15%31.76%38.39%23.43%31.23%72.64%
IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
19.22%12.66%11.38%16.83%-20.48%14.54%20.03%25.39%-11.12%14.58%

Correlation

The correlation between ISRG and IWM is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2000

0.49

The correlation between ISRG and IWM shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.53 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISRG vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISRG
ISRG Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
ISRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISRG Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
ISRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISRG Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

IWM
IWM Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
IWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWM Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
IWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISRG vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ISRGIWMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.33

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.62

3.57

-4.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.24

12.63

-13.87

ISRG vs. IWM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISRG Sharpe Ratio is -0.65, which is lower than the IWM Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISRG and IWM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ISRG vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISRG drawdown since its inception was -82.26%, which is greater than IWM's maximum drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISRG and IWM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISRGIWMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.26%

-59.05%

-23.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.14%

-11.03%

-21.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.10%

-27.50%

-6.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.90%

-31.91%

-17.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.90%

-41.13%

-8.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.66%

0.00%

-32.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.28%

-10.76%

-10.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.00%

3.12%

+12.88%

Volatility

ISRG vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison

Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG) has a higher volatility of 9.70% compared to iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) at 7.16%. This indicates that ISRG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISRGIWMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.70%

7.16%

+2.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.72%

14.29%

+6.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.69%

19.73%

+10.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.19%

22.61%

+10.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.40%

23.08%

+9.32%

Dividends

ISRG vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison

ISRG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ISRG
Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
0.87%1.04%1.15%1.35%1.48%0.94%1.04%1.26%1.40%1.26%1.38%1.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


ISRG and IWM have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ISRG has higher volatility (9.70%) compared to IWM (7.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISRG dropped -82.26% vs IWM's -59.05%.

IWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISRG and IWM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer