PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISRA vs. SMH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISRA vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Israel ETF (ISRA) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISRA achieves a 14.05% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 77.13% return. Over the past 10 years, ISRA has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 10.83%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 37.68% annualized return.


ISRA

1D
-2.47%
1M
-1.80%
YTD
14.05%
6M
17.88%
1Y
41.95%
3Y*
26.30%
5Y*
9.13%
10Y*
10.83%

SMH

1D
0.90%
1M
25.87%
YTD
77.13%
6M
75.61%
1Y
157.20%
3Y*
64.17%
5Y*
39.21%
10Y*
37.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISRA vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ISRA
VanEck Israel ETF
14.05%36.98%26.03%-0.08%-25.76%10.06%28.21%26.77%-7.04%15.07%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
77.13%49.17%39.10%73.38%-33.53%42.13%55.53%64.45%-9.05%38.48%

Correlation

The correlation between ISRA and SMH is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2013

0.62

The correlation between ISRA and SMH shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ISRA vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ISRA
SMH

Financial Services

38.3%

-

Technology

22.2%
100.0%

Healthcare

11.8%

-

Industrials

10.5%

-

Utilities

5.0%

-

Real Estate

4.7%

-

Energy

2.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

1.9%

-

Communication Services

1.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.5%

-

Basic Materials

0.2%

-

Financial Services

ISRA
38.3%
SMH

-

Technology

ISRA
22.2%
SMH
100.0%

Healthcare

ISRA
11.8%
SMH

-

Industrials

ISRA
10.5%
SMH

-

Utilities

ISRA
5.0%
SMH

-

Real Estate

ISRA
4.7%
SMH

-

Energy

ISRA
2.1%
SMH

-

Consumer Cyclical

ISRA
1.9%
SMH

-

Communication Services

ISRA
1.8%
SMH

-

Consumer Defensive

ISRA
1.5%
SMH

-

Basic Materials

ISRA
0.2%
SMH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISRA vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISRA
ISRA Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
ISRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISRA Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
ISRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISRA Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

SMH
SMH Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISRA vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Israel ETF (ISRA) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ISRASMHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.72

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.83

10.59

-6.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.53

40.63

-26.10

ISRA vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISRA Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is lower than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 5.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISRA and SMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ISRASMHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

5.19

-3.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

1.13

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

1.16

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.34

+0.13

Drawdowns

ISRA vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISRA drawdown since its inception was -45.02%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISRA and SMH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISRASMHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.02%

-84.96%

+39.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.02%

-14.93%

+3.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.74%

-35.74%

+8.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.02%

-45.30%

+0.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.02%

-45.30%

+0.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.73%

0.00%

-4.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.19%

-41.09%

+29.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

3.89%

-0.99%

Volatility

ISRA vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Israel ETF (ISRA) is 5.30%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 11.47%. This indicates that ISRA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISRASMHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.30%

11.47%

-6.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.91%

24.29%

-9.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.84%

30.56%

-9.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.87%

35.01%

-13.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.91%

32.57%

-11.66%

ISRA vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISRA has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

ISRA vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

ISRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, more than SMH's 0.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ISRA
VanEck Israel ETF
1.30%1.48%1.21%1.89%1.36%1.28%0.17%1.38%0.76%1.58%1.62%1.31%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
0.17%0.31%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


ISRA and SMH have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMH has higher volatility (11.47%) compared to ISRA (5.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISRA dropped -45.02% vs SMH's -84.96%.

On 10-year performance, SMH leads with 37.68% vs 10.83% for ISRA. On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, ISRA has been the lower-risk option at 5.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SMH has performed better with a 37.68% return vs 10.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for ISRA.

ISRA has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 0.17% for SMH.

ISRA is categorized as Global Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. ISRA tracks BlueStar Israel Global Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for ISRA and 0.35% for SMH.

SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.19 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISRA and SMH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer