PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISRA vs. BIZD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISRA vs. BIZD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Israel ETF (ISRA) and VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISRA achieves a 16.94% return, which is significantly higher than BIZD's -6.86% return. Over the past 10 years, ISRA has outperformed BIZD with an annualized return of 11.11%, while BIZD has yielded a comparatively lower 8.02% annualized return.


ISRA

1D
-0.56%
1M
2.26%
YTD
16.94%
6M
22.33%
1Y
45.96%
3Y*
27.36%
5Y*
9.87%
10Y*
11.11%

BIZD

1D
-0.70%
1M
-4.36%
YTD
-6.86%
6M
-6.58%
1Y
-10.35%
3Y*
6.08%
5Y*
4.54%
10Y*
8.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISRA vs. BIZD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ISRA
VanEck Israel ETF
16.94%36.98%26.03%-0.08%-25.76%10.06%28.21%26.77%-7.04%15.07%
BIZD
VanEck BDC Income ETF
-6.86%-4.96%15.63%27.02%-8.51%36.25%-7.12%30.87%-6.88%0.36%

Correlation

The correlation between ISRA and BIZD is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2013

0.47

The correlation between ISRA and BIZD shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.51 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ISRA vs. BIZD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ISRA
BIZD

Financial Services

38.3%
100.0%

Technology

22.2%

-

Healthcare

11.8%

-

Industrials

10.5%

-

Utilities

5.0%

-

Real Estate

4.7%

-

Energy

2.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

1.9%

-

Communication Services

1.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.5%

-

Basic Materials

0.2%

-

Financial Services

ISRA
38.3%
BIZD
100.0%

Technology

ISRA
22.2%
BIZD

-

Healthcare

ISRA
11.8%
BIZD

-

Industrials

ISRA
10.5%
BIZD

-

Utilities

ISRA
5.0%
BIZD

-

Real Estate

ISRA
4.7%
BIZD

-

Energy

ISRA
2.1%
BIZD

-

Consumer Cyclical

ISRA
1.9%
BIZD

-

Communication Services

ISRA
1.8%
BIZD

-

Consumer Defensive

ISRA
1.5%
BIZD

-

Basic Materials

ISRA
0.2%
BIZD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISRA vs. BIZD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISRA
ISRA Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
ISRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISRA Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
ISRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISRA Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

BIZD
BIZD Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
BIZD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIZD Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIZD Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
BIZD Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIZD Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISRA vs. BIZD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Israel ETF (ISRA) and VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ISRABIZDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.23

-0.58

+2.81

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.08

-0.72

+3.80

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

0.92

+0.46

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.26

-0.50

+4.76

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.30

-0.88

+17.18

ISRA vs. BIZD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISRA Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is higher than the BIZD Sharpe Ratio of -0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISRA and BIZD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ISRABIZDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.23

-0.58

+2.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.26

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.37

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.31

+0.17

Drawdowns

ISRA vs. BIZD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISRA drawdown since its inception was -45.02%, smaller than the maximum BIZD drawdown of -55.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISRA and BIZD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISRABIZDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.02%

-55.44%

+10.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.02%

-22.22%

+11.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.74%

-22.56%

-5.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.02%

-22.91%

-22.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.02%

-55.44%

+10.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.32%

-17.39%

+15.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.19%

-6.71%

-4.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

12.58%

-9.70%

Volatility

ISRA vs. BIZD - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Israel ETF (ISRA) has a higher volatility of 4.90% compared to VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD) at 4.33%. This indicates that ISRA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIZD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISRABIZDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.90%

4.33%

+0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.67%

14.61%

+0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.68%

17.99%

+2.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.84%

17.37%

+4.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.90%

21.73%

-0.83%

ISRA vs. BIZD - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISRA has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than BIZD's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

ISRA vs. BIZD - Dividend Comparison

ISRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, less than BIZD's 13.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIZD
VanEck BDC Income ETF
13.56%11.78%10.94%10.96%11.21%8.14%10.39%9.13%10.88%9.13%8.51%9.12%
ISRA
VanEck Israel ETF
1.26%1.48%1.21%1.89%1.36%1.28%0.17%1.38%0.76%1.58%1.62%1.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


ISRA and BIZD have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ISRA has higher volatility (4.90%) compared to BIZD (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISRA dropped -45.02% vs BIZD's -55.44%.

On 10-year performance, ISRA leads with 11.11% vs 8.02% for BIZD. On fees, BIZD is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, BIZD has been the lower-risk option at 4.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ISRA has performed better with a 11.11% return vs 8.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BIZD is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for ISRA.

BIZD has the higher dividend yield at 13.56%, compared with 1.26% for ISRA.

ISRA is categorized as Global Equities, while BIZD is Financials Equities. ISRA tracks BlueStar Israel Global Index, while BIZD tracks MVIS US Business Development Companies Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for ISRA and 0.42% for BIZD.

ISRA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISRA and BIZD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer