PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISRA vs. PID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISRA vs. PID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Israel ETF (ISRA) and Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISRA achieves a 14.05% return, which is significantly higher than PID's 5.45% return. Over the past 10 years, ISRA has outperformed PID with an annualized return of 10.83%, while PID has yielded a comparatively lower 8.80% annualized return.


ISRA

1D
-2.47%
1M
-1.80%
YTD
14.05%
6M
17.88%
1Y
41.95%
3Y*
26.30%
5Y*
9.13%
10Y*
10.83%

PID

1D
-1.07%
1M
1.28%
YTD
5.45%
6M
6.61%
1Y
16.04%
3Y*
12.52%
5Y*
8.28%
10Y*
8.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISRA vs. PID - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ISRA
VanEck Israel ETF
14.05%36.98%26.03%-0.08%-25.76%10.06%28.21%26.77%-7.04%15.07%
PID
Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF
5.45%24.45%3.08%14.28%-6.48%24.49%-6.56%25.87%-11.46%19.05%

Correlation

The correlation between ISRA and PID is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2013

0.58

Over the past year, the correlation between ISRA and PID has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

ISRA vs. PID - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ISRA
PID

Financial Services

38.3%
17.5%

Technology

22.2%
8.7%

Healthcare

11.8%
8.4%

Industrials

10.5%
7.9%

Utilities

5.0%
14.2%

Real Estate

4.7%
0.4%

Energy

2.1%
13.3%

Consumer Cyclical

1.9%
6.4%

Communication Services

1.8%
13.8%

Consumer Defensive

1.5%
6.0%

Basic Materials

0.2%
3.4%

Financial Services

ISRA
38.3%
PID
17.5%

Technology

ISRA
22.2%
PID
8.7%

Healthcare

ISRA
11.8%
PID
8.4%

Industrials

ISRA
10.5%
PID
7.9%

Utilities

ISRA
5.0%
PID
14.2%

Real Estate

ISRA
4.7%
PID
0.4%

Energy

ISRA
2.1%
PID
13.3%

Consumer Cyclical

ISRA
1.9%
PID
6.4%

Communication Services

ISRA
1.8%
PID
13.8%

Consumer Defensive

ISRA
1.5%
PID
6.0%

Basic Materials

ISRA
0.2%
PID
3.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISRA vs. PID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISRA
ISRA Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
ISRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISRA Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
ISRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISRA Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

PID
PID Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
PID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PID Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
PID Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
PID Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
PID Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISRA vs. PID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Israel ETF (ISRA) and Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ISRAPIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.30

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.83

2.16

+1.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.53

7.36

+7.17

ISRA vs. PID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISRA Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the PID Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISRA and PID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ISRAPIDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

1.66

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.60

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.49

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.27

+0.20

Drawdowns

ISRA vs. PID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISRA drawdown since its inception was -45.02%, smaller than the maximum PID drawdown of -66.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISRA and PID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISRAPIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.02%

-66.34%

+21.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.02%

-7.47%

-3.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.74%

-13.34%

-14.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.02%

-22.97%

-22.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.02%

-46.07%

+1.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.73%

-2.19%

-2.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.19%

-13.04%

+1.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

2.18%

+0.72%

Volatility

ISRA vs. PID - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Israel ETF (ISRA) has a higher volatility of 5.30% compared to Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID) at 2.75%. This indicates that ISRA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISRAPIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.30%

2.75%

+2.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.91%

7.62%

+7.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.84%

9.70%

+11.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.87%

13.97%

+7.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.91%

17.84%

+3.07%

ISRA vs. PID - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISRA has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than PID's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

ISRA vs. PID - Dividend Comparison

ISRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, less than PID's 3.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ISRA
VanEck Israel ETF
1.30%1.48%1.21%1.89%1.36%1.28%0.17%1.38%0.76%1.58%1.62%1.31%
PID
Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF
3.27%3.28%3.88%3.31%3.30%3.30%3.16%3.99%3.87%3.46%3.90%4.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


ISRA and PID have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ISRA has higher volatility (5.30%) compared to PID (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISRA dropped -45.02% vs PID's -66.34%.

On 10-year performance, ISRA leads with 10.83% vs 8.80% for PID. On fees, PID is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, PID has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ISRA has performed better with a 10.83% return vs 8.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PID is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for ISRA.

PID has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 1.30% for ISRA.

ISRA tracks BlueStar Israel Global Index, while PID tracks Nasdaq International Dividend Achievers (NR). They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for ISRA and 0.56% for PID.

ISRA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISRA and PID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer