ISRA vs. INKM
ISRA (VanEck Israel ETF) and INKM (SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF) are both Global Equities funds. ISRA is passively managed, while INKM is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, ISRA returned 10.83%/yr vs 5.59%/yr for INKM. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ISRA charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for INKM.
Performance
ISRA vs. INKM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISRA achieves a 14.05% return, which is significantly higher than INKM's 5.61% return. Over the past 10 years, ISRA has outperformed INKM with an annualized return of 10.83%, while INKM has yielded a comparatively lower 5.59% annualized return.
ISRA
- 1D
- -2.47%
- 1M
- -1.80%
- YTD
- 14.05%
- 6M
- 17.88%
- 1Y
- 41.95%
- 3Y*
- 26.30%
- 5Y*
- 9.13%
- 10Y*
- 10.83%
INKM
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.93%
- YTD
- 5.61%
- 6M
- 5.74%
- 1Y
- 13.00%
- 3Y*
- 10.04%
- 5Y*
- 3.96%
- 10Y*
- 5.59%
ISRA vs. INKM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISRA VanEck Israel ETF | 14.05% | 36.98% | 26.03% | -0.08% | -25.76% | 10.06% | 28.21% | 26.77% | -7.04% | 15.07% |
INKM SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF | 5.61% | 11.86% | 5.70% | 10.26% | -12.58% | 8.52% | 3.11% | 17.12% | -5.32% | 13.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISRA and INKM is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2013 | 0.57 |
The correlation between ISRA and INKM shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.59 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ISRA vs. INKM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ISRA
INKM
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Real Estate
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Financial Services
ISRA
INKM
Technology
ISRA
INKM
Healthcare
ISRA
INKM
Industrials
ISRA
INKM
Utilities
ISRA
INKM
Real Estate
ISRA
INKM
Energy
ISRA
INKM
Consumer Cyclical
ISRA
INKM
Communication Services
ISRA
INKM
Consumer Defensive
ISRA
INKM
Basic Materials
ISRA
INKM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISRA vs. INKM — Risk / Return Rank
ISRA
INKM
ISRA vs. INKM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Israel ETF (ISRA) and SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ISRA | INKM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.42 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.83 | 2.87 | +0.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.53 | 11.30 | +3.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ISRA | INKM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | 2.20 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.48 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.57 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.57 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
ISRA vs. INKM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISRA drawdown since its inception was -45.02%, which is greater than INKM's maximum drawdown of -28.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISRA and INKM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISRA | INKM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.02% | -28.58% | -16.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.02% | -4.55% | -6.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.74% | -9.25% | -18.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.02% | -19.18% | -25.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.02% | -28.58% | -16.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.73% | -0.33% | -4.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.19% | -3.69% | -7.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 1.15% | +1.75% |
Volatility
ISRA vs. INKM - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Israel ETF (ISRA) has a higher volatility of 5.30% compared to SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM) at 1.67%. This indicates that ISRA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INKM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISRA | INKM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.30% | 1.67% | +3.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.91% | 4.59% | +10.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.84% | 5.95% | +14.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.87% | 8.30% | +13.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.91% | 9.78% | +11.13% |
ISRA vs. INKM - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISRA has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than INKM's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISRA vs. INKM - Dividend Comparison
ISRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, less than INKM's 4.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INKM SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF | 4.86% | 5.82% | 4.83% | 4.56% | 5.03% | 3.74% | 3.88% | 4.38% | 4.08% | 3.10% | 3.39% | 3.45% |
ISRA VanEck Israel ETF | 1.30% | 1.48% | 1.21% | 1.89% | 1.36% | 1.28% | 0.17% | 1.38% | 0.76% | 1.58% | 1.62% | 1.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISRA and INKM have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ISRA has higher volatility (5.30%) compared to INKM (1.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISRA dropped -45.02% vs INKM's -28.58%.
On 10-year performance, ISRA leads with 10.83% vs 5.59% for INKM. On fees, INKM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, INKM has been the lower-risk option at 1.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ISRA has performed better with a 10.83% return vs 5.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
INKM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for ISRA.
INKM has the higher dividend yield at 4.86%, compared with 1.30% for ISRA.
They also come from different issuers: VanEck and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for ISRA and 0.50% for INKM.
INKM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ISRA and INKM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer