ISMD vs. WWJD
ISMD (Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact ETF) and WWJD (Inspire International ESG ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ISMD is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact Equal Weight Index, while WWJD is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Inspire Global Hope Ex-US Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ISMD returned 7.62%/yr vs 6.59%/yr for WWJD. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ISMD charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for WWJD.
Performance
ISMD vs. WWJD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISMD achieves a 21.54% return, which is significantly higher than WWJD's 7.15% return.
ISMD
- 1D
- -1.62%
- 1M
- 5.36%
- YTD
- 21.54%
- 6M
- 20.97%
- 1Y
- 36.88%
- 3Y*
- 16.11%
- 5Y*
- 7.62%
- 10Y*
- —
WWJD
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 7.15%
- 6M
- 9.72%
- 1Y
- 19.41%
- 3Y*
- 14.98%
- 5Y*
- 6.59%
- 10Y*
- —
ISMD vs. WWJD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISMD Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact ETF | 21.54% | 4.14% | 9.53% | 16.74% | -13.44% | 29.38% | 7.45% | 9.49% |
WWJD Inspire International ESG ETF | 7.15% | 29.28% | 1.05% | 16.42% | -14.60% | 16.60% | 12.91% | 11.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISMD and WWJD is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2019 | 0.72 |
The correlation between ISMD and WWJD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
ISMD vs. WWJD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ISMD
WWJD
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
ISMD
WWJD
Technology
ISMD
WWJD
Financial Services
ISMD
WWJD
Consumer Cyclical
ISMD
WWJD
Healthcare
ISMD
WWJD
Real Estate
ISMD
WWJD
Consumer Defensive
ISMD
WWJD
Basic Materials
ISMD
WWJD
Energy
ISMD
WWJD
Utilities
ISMD
WWJD
Communication Services
ISMD
WWJD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISMD vs. WWJD — Risk / Return Rank
ISMD
WWJD
ISMD vs. WWJD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact ETF (ISMD) and Inspire International ESG ETF (WWJD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ISMD | WWJD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.01 | 1.43 | +0.58 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.82 | 1.99 | +0.84 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.26 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.84 | 1.81 | +2.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.04 | 7.02 | +5.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ISMD | WWJD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.01 | 1.43 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.40 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.56 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
ISMD vs. WWJD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISMD drawdown since its inception was -44.60%, which is greater than WWJD's maximum drawdown of -35.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISMD and WWJD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISMD | WWJD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.60% | -35.76% | -8.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.64% | -10.77% | +1.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.64% | -14.97% | -11.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.64% | -29.51% | +2.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.62% | -2.93% | +1.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.17% | -6.97% | -1.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.07% | 2.77% | +0.30% |
Volatility
ISMD vs. WWJD - Volatility Comparison
Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact ETF (ISMD) and Inspire International ESG ETF (WWJD) have volatilities of 4.95% and 4.73%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISMD | WWJD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.95% | 4.73% | +0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.52% | 11.48% | +1.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.56% | 13.67% | +4.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.87% | 16.66% | +4.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.74% | 20.08% | +3.66% |
ISMD vs. WWJD - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISMD has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than WWJD's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISMD vs. WWJD - Dividend Comparison
ISMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than WWJD's 2.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISMD Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact ETF | 0.95% | 1.21% | 1.24% | 1.17% | 1.28% | 9.35% | 0.99% | 0.88% | 1.35% | 2.02% |
WWJD Inspire International ESG ETF | 2.21% | 2.58% | 2.99% | 2.56% | 2.09% | 15.22% | 1.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISMD and WWJD have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ISMD has higher volatility (4.95%) compared to WWJD (4.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISMD dropped -44.60% vs WWJD's -35.76%.
On 5-year performance, ISMD leads with 7.62% vs 6.59% for WWJD. On fees, ISMD is cheaper at 0.57% per year. On volatility, WWJD has been the lower-risk option at 4.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ISMD has performed better with a 7.62% return vs 6.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ISMD is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for WWJD.
WWJD has the higher dividend yield at 2.21%, compared with 0.95% for ISMD.
ISMD is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while WWJD is Foreign Large Cap Equities. ISMD tracks Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact Equal Weight Index, while WWJD tracks Inspire Global Hope Ex-US Index. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for ISMD and 0.80% for WWJD.
ISMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ISMD and WWJD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer