ISMD vs. FSAGX

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

ISMD (Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact ETF) and FSAGX (Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio) are both funds - ISMD is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact Equal Weight Index, while FSAGX is a Gold fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, ISMD returned 8.12%/yr vs 13.39%/yr for FSAGX. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ISMD charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.73%/yr for FSAGX.

Performance

ISMD vs. FSAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact ETF (ISMD) and Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISMD achieves a 25.67% return, which is significantly higher than FSAGX's -7.23% return.

ISMD

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 7.61%
• YTD: 25.67%
• 6M: 22.34%
• 1Y: 38.96%
• 3Y*: 16.11%
• 5Y*: 8.12%
• 10Y*: —

FSAGX

• 1D: 5.17%
• 1M: -18.57%
• YTD: -7.23%
• 6M: -6.19%
• 1Y: 40.96%
• 3Y*: 35.82%
• 5Y*: 13.39%
• 10Y*: 10.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISMD vs. FSAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ISMD Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact ETF	25.67%	4.14%	9.53%	16.74%	-13.44%	29.38%	7.45%	24.62%	-12.63%	8.73%
FSAGX Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio	-7.23%	143.05%	14.97%	-0.37%	-13.46%	-10.44%	26.83%	35.50%	-13.00%	-1.03%

Correlation

The correlation between ISMD and FSAGX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.29
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2017	0.18

The correlation between ISMD and FSAGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (all time) to 0.30 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ISMD vs. FSAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISMD

ISMD Risk / Return Rank: 75
ISMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
ISMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
ISMD Omega Ratio Rank: 67
ISMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
ISMD Martin Ratio Rank: 76

FSAGX

FSAGX Risk / Return Rank: 20
FSAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
FSAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
FSAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 24
FSAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
FSAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISMD vs. FSAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact ETF (ISMD) and Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ISMD	FSAGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.08	1.02	+1.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.90	1.43	+1.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.20	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.06	1.27	+2.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.77	3.61	+9.17

ISMD vs. FSAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISMD Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is higher than the FSAGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISMD and FSAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ISMD vs. FSAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISMD drawdown since its inception was -44.60%, smaller than the maximum FSAGX drawdown of -77.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISMD and FSAGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ISMD	FSAGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.60%	-77.21%	+32.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.64%	-35.40%	+25.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.64%	-35.40%	+8.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.64%	-45.94%	+19.30%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-50.57%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.23%	-32.06%	+31.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.15%	-33.35%	+25.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.07%	12.47%	-9.40%

Volatility

ISMD vs. FSAGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact ETF (ISMD) is 5.94%, while Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX) has a volatility of 16.84%. This indicates that ISMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ISMD	FSAGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.94%	16.84%	-10.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.91%	37.09%	-24.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.81%	44.36%	-25.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.92%	33.99%	-13.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.73%	33.29%	-9.56%

ISMD vs. FSAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISMD has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than FSAGX's 0.73% expense ratio.

Dividends

ISMD vs. FSAGX - Dividend Comparison

ISMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than FSAGX's 5.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FSAGX Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio	5.53%	2.17%	3.62%	0.99%	0.36%	1.60%	4.40%	0.40%	0.00%	0.22%	3.57%
ISMD Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact ETF	0.92%	1.21%	1.24%	1.17%	1.28%	9.35%	0.99%	0.88%	1.35%	2.02%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ISMD and FSAGX in my portfolio?

ISMD and FSAGX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ISMD or FSAGX?

FSAGX has higher volatility (16.84%) compared to ISMD (5.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISMD dropped -44.60% vs FSAGX's -77.21%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ISMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.