ISMD vs. DFMC
ISMD (Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact ETF) and DFMC (Dimensional US Micro Cap Portfolio ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. ISMD is passively managed, while DFMC is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ISMD charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for DFMC.
Performance
ISMD vs. DFMC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ISMD
- 1D
- -1.62%
- 1M
- 5.36%
- YTD
- 21.54%
- 6M
- 20.97%
- 1Y
- 36.88%
- 3Y*
- 16.11%
- 5Y*
- 7.62%
- 10Y*
- —
DFMC
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- 1.77%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISMD vs. DFMC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ISMD Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact ETF | 17.84% |
DFMC Dimensional US Micro Cap Portfolio ETF | 11.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISMD and DFMC is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2026 | 0.94 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISMD vs. DFMC — Risk / Return Rank
ISMD
DFMC
ISMD vs. DFMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact ETF (ISMD) and Dimensional US Micro Cap Portfolio ETF (DFMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ISMD | DFMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.84 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.04 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ISMD | DFMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 4.79 | -4.40 |
Drawdowns
ISMD vs. DFMC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISMD drawdown since its inception was -44.60%, which is greater than DFMC's maximum drawdown of -4.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISMD and DFMC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISMD | DFMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.60% | -4.29% | -40.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.62% | -1.12% | -0.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.17% | -0.84% | -7.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.07% | — | — |
Volatility
ISMD vs. DFMC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISMD | DFMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.95% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.52% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.56% | 16.19% | +2.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.87% | 16.19% | +4.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.74% | 16.19% | +7.55% |
ISMD vs. DFMC - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISMD has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than DFMC's 0.41% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISMD vs. DFMC - Dividend Comparison
ISMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, while DFMC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFMC Dimensional US Micro Cap Portfolio ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ISMD Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact ETF | 0.95% | 1.21% | 1.24% | 1.17% | 1.28% | 9.35% | 0.99% | 0.88% | 1.35% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, ISMD and DFMC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, DFMC is cheaper at 0.41% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DFMC is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for ISMD.
ISMD has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.00% for DFMC.
They also come from different issuers: Inspire and Dimensional Fund Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for ISMD and 0.41% for DFMC.
Find the right allocation for ISMD and DFMC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer