ISLN.L vs. XLM-USD
ISLN.L (iShares Physical Silver ETC) is Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price, while XLM-USD (Stellar) is a cryptocurrency. Over the past 10 years, ISLN.L returned 14.26%/yr vs 60.23%/yr for XLM-USD. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ISLN.L vs. XLM-USD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISLN.L achieves a -5.58% return, which is significantly higher than XLM-USD's -6.87% return. Over the past 10 years, ISLN.L has underperformed XLM-USD with an annualized return of 14.26%, while XLM-USD has yielded a comparatively higher 60.23% annualized return.
ISLN.L
- 1D
- 5.80%
- 1M
- -20.59%
- YTD
- -5.58%
- 6M
- 9.90%
- 1Y
- 86.37%
- 3Y*
- 41.38%
- 5Y*
- 19.06%
- 10Y*
- 14.26%
XLM-USD
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- 15.17%
- YTD
- -6.87%
- 6M
- -21.39%
- 1Y
- -28.35%
- 3Y*
- 33.09%
- 5Y*
- -11.45%
- 10Y*
- 60.23%
ISLN.L vs. XLM-USD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISLN.L iShares Physical Silver ETC | -5.58% | 147.62% | 21.10% | -0.76% | 3.39% | -12.85% | 45.85% | 16.36% | -8.76% | 3.66% |
XLM-USD Stellar | -6.87% | -39.55% | 157.40% | 81.66% | -73.35% | 108.68% | 184.76% | -60.36% | -68.37% | 14,396.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISLN.L and XLM-USD is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2014 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISLN.L vs. XLM-USD — Risk / Return Rank
ISLN.L
XLM-USD
ISLN.L vs. XLM-USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Silver ETC (ISLN.L) and Stellar (XLM-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ISLN.L | XLM-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.00 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.96 | -0.40 | +2.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.36 | -0.57 | +4.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ISLN.L vs. XLM-USD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISLN.L drawdown since its inception was -76.69%, smaller than the maximum XLM-USD drawdown of -96.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISLN.L and XLM-USD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISLN.L | XLM-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.69% | -96.21% | +19.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.83% | -71.19% | +27.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.83% | -74.37% | +30.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.83% | -83.25% | +39.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.83% | -96.21% | +52.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.57% | -78.80% | +38.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.73% | -72.14% | +18.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.70% | 50.48% | -30.78% |
Volatility
ISLN.L vs. XLM-USD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Physical Silver ETC (ISLN.L) is 15.90%, while Stellar (XLM-USD) has a volatility of 43.48%. This indicates that ISLN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLM-USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISLN.L | XLM-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.90% | 43.48% | -27.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.92% | 59.28% | -4.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.77% | 70.60% | -12.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.79% | 74.72% | -38.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.08% | 112.79% | -81.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISLN.L and XLM-USD have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for ISLN.L and XLM-USD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer