ISHP vs. PSCD
ISHP (First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF) and PSCD (Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Discretionary ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - ISHP tracks the S-Network Global E-Commerce Index while PSCD tracks the S&P Small Cap 600 / Consumer Discretionary -SEC. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ISHP returned 1.58%/yr vs 1.98%/yr for PSCD. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ISHP charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for PSCD.
Performance
ISHP vs. PSCD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISHP achieves a -11.94% return, which is significantly lower than PSCD's 12.29% return.
ISHP
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 2.21%
- 6M
- -15.90%
- YTD
- -11.94%
- 1Y
- -11.94%
- 3Y*
- 8.13%
- 5Y*
- 1.58%
- 10Y*
- —
PSCD
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 2.34%
- 6M
- 3.15%
- YTD
- 12.29%
- 1Y
- 12.32%
- 3Y*
- 9.02%
- 5Y*
- 1.98%
- 10Y*
- 10.08%
ISHP vs. PSCD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISHP First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF | -11.94% | 12.27% | 24.17% | 22.24% | -33.79% | 30.09% | 15.33% | 19.74% | -2.04% | 7.66% |
PSCD Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Discretionary ETF | 12.29% | -2.87% | 6.46% | 33.23% | -28.06% | 37.34% | 29.07% | 17.49% | -9.28% | 18.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISHP and PSCD is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2016 | 0.57 |
The correlation between ISHP and PSCD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
ISHP vs. PSCD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ISHP
PSCD
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Technology
Real Estate
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
ISHP
PSCD
Communication Services
ISHP
PSCD
Industrials
ISHP
PSCD
Technology
ISHP
PSCD
Real Estate
ISHP
PSCD
Healthcare
ISHP
PSCD
-
Financial Services
ISHP
PSCD
-
Consumer Defensive
ISHP
PSCD
Basic Materials
ISHP
-
PSCD
-
Energy
ISHP
-
PSCD
-
Utilities
ISHP
-
PSCD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISHP vs. PSCD — Risk / Return Rank
ISHP
PSCD
ISHP vs. PSCD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF (ISHP) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Discretionary ETF (PSCD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ISHP | PSCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.11 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.48 | 0.72 | -1.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.90 | 1.78 | -2.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ISHP vs. PSCD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISHP drawdown since its inception was -47.57%, smaller than the maximum PSCD drawdown of -56.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISHP and PSCD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISHP | PSCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.57% | -56.57% | +9.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.75% | -17.14% | -7.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.75% | -31.93% | +7.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.57% | -40.03% | -7.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -56.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.10% | -2.22% | -16.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.74% | -11.28% | -1.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.26% | 6.93% | +6.33% |
Volatility
ISHP vs. PSCD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF (ISHP) is 5.21%, while Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Discretionary ETF (PSCD) has a volatility of 6.98%. This indicates that ISHP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSCD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISHP | PSCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.21% | 6.98% | -1.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.24% | 16.85% | -2.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.76% | 24.28% | -6.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.27% | 27.74% | -0.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.04% | 29.07% | -5.03% |
ISHP vs. PSCD - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISHP has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than PSCD's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISHP vs. PSCD - Dividend Comparison
ISHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, more than PSCD's 1.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISHP First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF | 1.18% | 1.34% | 1.02% | 1.58% | 0.76% | 0.53% | 0.82% | 1.16% | 0.89% | 1.65% | 0.23% | 0.00% |
PSCD Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Discretionary ETF | 1.00% | 0.94% | 1.28% | 1.09% | 1.60% | 0.57% | 0.56% | 0.91% | 1.39% | 0.97% | 1.07% | 1.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISHP and PSCD have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSCD has higher volatility (6.98%) compared to ISHP (5.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISHP dropped -47.57% vs PSCD's -56.57%.
On 5-year performance, PSCD leads with 1.98% vs 1.58% for ISHP. On fees, PSCD is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, ISHP has been the lower-risk option at 5.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PSCD has performed better with a 1.98% return vs 1.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSCD is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ISHP.
ISHP has the higher dividend yield at 1.18%, compared with 1.00% for PSCD.
ISHP tracks S-Network Global E-Commerce Index, while PSCD tracks S&P Small Cap 600 / Consumer Discretionary -SEC. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ISHP and 0.29% for PSCD.
PSCD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.51 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ISHP and PSCD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer