PSCD vs. RTH
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Discretionary ETF (PSCD) and VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH).
PSCD and RTH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PSCD is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Small Cap 600 / Consumer Discretionary -SEC. It was launched on Apr 7, 2010. RTH is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Listed Retail 25 Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2011. Both PSCD and RTH are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PSCD or RTH.
Correlation
The correlation between PSCD and RTH is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
PSCD vs. RTH - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
PSCD:
0.44
RTH:
1.83
PSCD:
0.79
RTH:
2.54
PSCD:
1.09
RTH:
1.32
PSCD:
0.51
RTH:
2.92
PSCD:
2.07
RTH:
7.49
PSCD:
4.87%
RTH:
2.97%
PSCD:
23.16%
RTH:
12.21%
PSCD:
-56.57%
RTH:
-41.80%
PSCD:
-8.45%
RTH:
-4.66%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSCD achieves a 6.95% return, which is significantly lower than RTH's 21.01% return. Over the past 10 years, PSCD has underperformed RTH with an annualized return of 9.47%, while RTH has yielded a comparatively higher 13.76% annualized return.
PSCD
6.95%
-0.23%
7.82%
7.35%
12.75%
9.47%
RTH
21.01%
1.61%
9.86%
21.51%
14.60%
13.76%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PSCD vs. RTH - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSCD has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than RTH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PSCD vs. RTH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Discretionary ETF (PSCD) and VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PSCD vs. RTH - Dividend Comparison
PSCD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, while RTH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCD Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Discretionary ETF | 1.03% | 1.09% | 1.60% | 0.57% | 0.55% | 0.91% | 1.39% | 0.97% | 1.06% | 1.10% | 0.69% | 0.43% |
RTH VanEck Vectors Retail ETF | 0.00% | 1.07% | 1.16% | 0.78% | 0.64% | 0.91% | 1.05% | 1.56% | 1.84% | 2.25% | 0.41% | 1.00% |
Drawdowns
PSCD vs. RTH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSCD drawdown since its inception was -56.57%, which is greater than RTH's maximum drawdown of -41.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCD and RTH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PSCD vs. RTH - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Discretionary ETF (PSCD) has a higher volatility of 7.56% compared to VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH) at 4.12%. This indicates that PSCD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.