ISHP vs. ONLN
ISHP (First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF) and ONLN (ProShares Online Retail ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - ISHP tracks the S-Network Global E-Commerce Index while ONLN tracks the ProShares Online Retail Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ISHP returned 1.58%/yr vs -5.67%/yr for ONLN. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ISHP charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for ONLN.
Performance
ISHP vs. ONLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISHP achieves a -10.97% return, which is significantly lower than ONLN's -4.42% return.
ISHP
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -1.59%
- YTD
- -10.97%
- 6M
- -10.01%
- 1Y
- -7.50%
- 3Y*
- 11.42%
- 5Y*
- 1.58%
- 10Y*
- —
ONLN
- 1D
- -1.27%
- 1M
- -5.82%
- YTD
- -4.42%
- 6M
- -5.53%
- 1Y
- 16.47%
- 3Y*
- 22.76%
- 5Y*
- -5.67%
- 10Y*
- —
ISHP vs. ONLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISHP First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF | -10.97% | 12.27% | 24.17% | 22.24% | -33.79% | 30.09% | 15.33% | 19.74% | -10.21% |
ONLN ProShares Online Retail ETF | -4.42% | 33.03% | 24.85% | 27.37% | -50.07% | -25.22% | 111.82% | 19.93% | -24.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISHP and ONLN is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2018 | 0.67 |
The correlation between ISHP and ONLN shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (all time) to 0.79 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ISHP vs. ONLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ISHP
ONLN
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Industrials
-
Technology
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
ISHP
ONLN
Communication Services
ISHP
ONLN
-
Industrials
ISHP
ONLN
-
Technology
ISHP
ONLN
Real Estate
ISHP
ONLN
-
Healthcare
ISHP
ONLN
-
Financial Services
ISHP
ONLN
-
Consumer Defensive
ISHP
ONLN
Basic Materials
ISHP
-
ONLN
-
Energy
ISHP
-
ONLN
-
Utilities
ISHP
-
ONLN
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISHP vs. ONLN — Risk / Return Rank
ISHP
ONLN
ISHP vs. ONLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF (ISHP) and ProShares Online Retail ETF (ONLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ISHP | ONLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | 0.70 | -1.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.50 | 1.09 | -1.59 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.13 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.27 | 0.90 | -1.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.59 | 2.31 | -2.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ISHP | ONLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.44 | 0.70 | -1.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | -0.17 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.15 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
ISHP vs. ONLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISHP drawdown since its inception was -47.57%, smaller than the maximum ONLN drawdown of -71.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISHP and ONLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISHP | ONLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.57% | -71.77% | +24.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.75% | -19.75% | -5.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.75% | -27.97% | +3.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.57% | -69.19% | +21.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.21% | -38.11% | +19.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.65% | -35.43% | +22.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.39% | 7.68% | +3.71% |
Volatility
ISHP vs. ONLN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF (ISHP) is 3.98%, while ProShares Online Retail ETF (ONLN) has a volatility of 5.94%. This indicates that ISHP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ONLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISHP | ONLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.98% | 5.94% | -1.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.27% | 17.19% | -3.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.13% | 23.68% | -6.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.29% | 33.06% | -5.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.09% | 32.10% | -8.01% |
ISHP vs. ONLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISHP has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ONLN's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISHP vs. ONLN - Dividend Comparison
ISHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, more than ONLN's 0.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISHP First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF | 1.50% | 1.34% | 1.02% | 1.58% | 0.76% | 0.53% | 0.82% | 1.16% | 0.89% | 1.65% | 0.23% |
ONLN ProShares Online Retail ETF | 0.34% | 0.30% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISHP and ONLN have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ONLN has higher volatility (5.94%) compared to ISHP (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISHP dropped -47.57% vs ONLN's -71.77%.
On 5-year performance, ISHP leads with 1.58% vs -5.67% for ONLN. On fees, ONLN is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, ISHP has been the lower-risk option at 3.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ISHP has performed better with a 1.58% return vs -5.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ONLN is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ISHP.
ISHP has the higher dividend yield at 1.50%, compared with 0.34% for ONLN.
ISHP tracks S-Network Global E-Commerce Index, while ONLN tracks ProShares Online Retail Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ISHP and 0.58% for ONLN.
ONLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.70 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ISHP and ONLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer