ISHP vs. ONLN
ISHP (First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF) and ONLN (ProShares Online Retail ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - ISHP tracks the S-Network Global E-Commerce Index while ONLN tracks the ProShares Online Retail Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ISHP returned 2.04%/yr vs -3.67%/yr for ONLN. Their 0.67 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ISHP charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for ONLN.
Performance
ISHP vs. ONLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISHP achieves a -8.73% return, which is significantly lower than ONLN's 0.64% return.
ISHP
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- 4.54%
- 6M
- -7.70%
- YTD
- -8.73%
- 1Y
- -8.31%
- 3Y*
- 8.87%
- 5Y*
- 2.04%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.29%
ONLN
- 1D
- 4.24%
- 1M
- 6.50%
- 6M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 0.64%
- 1Y
- 12.31%
- 3Y*
- 18.67%
- 5Y*
- -3.67%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.36%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $7.11K | $5.31K | $3.27K | |
| $490.13K | $484.04K | $423.49K |
ISHP vs. ONLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISHP First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF | -8.73% | 12.27% | 24.17% | 22.24% | -33.79% | 30.09% | 15.33% | 19.74% | -10.21% |
ONLN ProShares Online Retail ETF | 0.64% | 33.03% | 24.85% | 27.37% | -50.07% | -25.22% | 111.82% | 19.93% | -24.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISHP and ONLN is 0.80, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2018 | 0.67 |
The correlation between ISHP and ONLN shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (all time) to 0.80 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ISHP vs. ONLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ISHP
ONLN
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Industrials
-
Technology
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
ISHP
ONLN
Communication Services
ISHP
ONLN
-
Industrials
ISHP
ONLN
-
Technology
ISHP
ONLN
Real Estate
ISHP
ONLN
-
Financial Services
ISHP
ONLN
-
Consumer Defensive
ISHP
ONLN
Healthcare
ISHP
ONLN
-
Basic Materials
ISHP
-
ONLN
-
Energy
ISHP
-
ONLN
-
Utilities
ISHP
-
ONLN
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISHP vs. ONLN — Risk / Return Rank
ISHP
ONLN
ISHP vs. ONLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF (ISHP) and ProShares Online Retail ETF (ONLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ISHP | ONLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.07 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.39 | 0.42 | -0.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.70 | 0.90 | -1.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ISHP vs. ONLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISHP drawdown since its inception was -47.57%, smaller than the maximum ONLN drawdown of -71.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISHP and ONLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISHP | ONLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.57% | -71.77% | +24.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.75% | -19.75% | -5.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.75% | -27.97% | +3.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.57% | -64.49% | +16.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.15% | -34.84% | +18.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.76% | -35.48% | +22.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.89% | 9.13% | +4.76% |
Volatility
ISHP vs. ONLN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF (ISHP) is 5.32%, while ProShares Online Retail ETF (ONLN) has a volatility of 7.48%. This indicates that ISHP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ONLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISHP | ONLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.32% | 7.48% | -2.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.80% | 19.40% | -4.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.30% | 25.42% | -7.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.32% | 33.00% | -5.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.03% | 32.01% | -7.98% |
ISHP vs. ONLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISHP has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ONLN's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISHP vs. ONLN - Dividend Comparison
ISHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, more than ONLN's 0.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISHP First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF | 1.14% | 1.34% | 1.02% | 1.58% | 0.76% | 0.53% | 0.82% | 1.16% | 0.89% | 1.65% | 0.23% |
ONLN ProShares Online Retail ETF | 0.28% | 0.30% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISHP and ONLN have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ONLN has higher volatility (7.48%) compared to ISHP (5.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISHP dropped -47.57% vs ONLN's -71.77%.
On 5-year performance, ISHP leads with 2.04% vs -3.67% for ONLN. On fees, ONLN is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, ISHP has been the lower-risk option at 5.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ISHP has performed better with a 2.04% return vs -3.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ONLN is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ISHP.
ISHP has the higher dividend yield at 1.14%, compared with 0.28% for ONLN.
ISHP tracks S-Network Global E-Commerce Index, while ONLN tracks ProShares Online Retail Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ISHP and 0.58% for ONLN.
ONLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.33 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ISHP and ONLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer