ISHP vs. GXPD
ISHP (First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF) and GXPD (Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - ISHP tracks the S-Network Global E-Commerce Index while GXPD tracks the MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary PureCap Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ISHP charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GXPD.
Performance
ISHP vs. GXPD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISHP achieves a -12.76% return, which is significantly lower than GXPD's -0.87% return.
ISHP
- 1D
- -2.02%
- 1M
- -2.47%
- YTD
- -12.76%
- 6M
- -12.24%
- 1Y
- -9.78%
- 3Y*
- 10.66%
- 5Y*
- 1.20%
- 10Y*
- —
GXPD
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- -2.13%
- YTD
- -0.87%
- 6M
- -0.98%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISHP vs. GXPD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ISHP First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF | -12.76% | -3.86% |
GXPD Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF | -0.87% | 5.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISHP and GXPD is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISHP vs. GXPD — Risk / Return Rank
ISHP
GXPD
ISHP vs. GXPD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF (ISHP) and Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF (GXPD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ISHP | GXPD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.40 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.85 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ISHP | GXPD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.26 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
ISHP vs. GXPD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISHP drawdown since its inception was -47.57%, which is greater than GXPD's maximum drawdown of -16.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISHP and GXPD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISHP | GXPD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.57% | -16.61% | -30.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.57% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.86% | -5.48% | -14.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.66% | -4.27% | -8.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.46% | — | — |
Volatility
ISHP vs. GXPD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISHP | GXPD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.32% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.42% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.23% | 20.01% | -2.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.29% | 20.01% | +7.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.10% | 20.01% | +4.09% |
ISHP vs. GXPD - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISHP has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than GXPD's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISHP vs. GXPD - Dividend Comparison
ISHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, more than GXPD's 0.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXPD Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF | 0.19% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ISHP First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF | 1.53% | 1.34% | 1.02% | 1.58% | 0.76% | 0.53% | 0.82% | 1.16% | 0.89% | 1.65% | 0.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISHP and GXPD have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXPD is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXPD is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ISHP.
ISHP has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 0.19% for GXPD.
ISHP tracks S-Network Global E-Commerce Index, while GXPD tracks MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary PureCap Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ISHP and 0.15% for GXPD.
Find the right allocation for ISHP and GXPD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer