ISCMF vs. RLY
ISCMF (iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF) and RLY (State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ISCMF is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index, while RLY is a Global Allocation fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ISCMF returned 10.24%/yr vs 12.93%/yr for RLY. Their 0.03 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ISCMF charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for RLY.
Performance
ISCMF vs. RLY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISCMF achieves a 11.96% return, which is significantly lower than RLY's 15.29% return.
ISCMF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 1.00%
- YTD
- 11.96%
- 1Y
- 21.66%
- 3Y*
- 10.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.78%
RLY
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 3.64%
- 6M
- 8.40%
- YTD
- 15.29%
- 1Y
- 27.11%
- 3Y*
- 12.93%
- 5Y*
- 10.64%
- 10Y*
- 8.16%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.75%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $8.28K | $54.64K | |
| $5.13M | $7.99M | $7.88M |
ISCMF vs. RLY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 11.96% | 19.65% | 3.13% | -9.58% | -5.82% |
RLY State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF | 15.29% | 20.26% | 2.53% | 2.56% | -0.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISCMF and RLY is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2022 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISCMF vs. RLY — Risk / Return Rank
ISCMF
RLY
ISCMF vs. RLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF) and State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ISCMF | RLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.81 | 1.47 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.59 | 3.61 | -2.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.71 | 12.56 | -7.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ISCMF vs. RLY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISCMF drawdown since its inception was -25.42%, smaller than the maximum RLY drawdown of -37.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISCMF and RLY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISCMF | RLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.42% | -37.75% | +12.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.68% | -7.54% | -6.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.68% | -10.08% | -3.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.68% | -3.15% | -10.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.31% | -9.40% | -3.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.61% | 2.16% | +2.45% |
Volatility
ISCMF vs. RLY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF) is 0.00%, while State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY) has a volatility of 2.61%. This indicates that ISCMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISCMF | RLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 2.61% | -2.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.04% | 8.06% | +8.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.61% | 10.61% | +9.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.74% | 13.46% | +1.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.74% | 13.80% | +0.94% |
ISCMF vs. RLY - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISCMF has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than RLY's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISCMF vs. RLY - Dividend Comparison
ISCMF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RLY State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF | 3.07% | 3.24% | 3.31% | 3.71% | 5.66% | 12.15% | 2.16% | 3.45% | 2.76% | 1.85% | 2.07% | 1.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISCMF and RLY have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RLY has higher volatility (2.61%) compared to ISCMF (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISCMF dropped -25.42% vs RLY's -37.75%.
On 3-year performance, RLY leads with 12.93% vs 10.24% for ISCMF. On fees, ISCMF is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, ISCMF has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, RLY has performed better with a 12.93% return vs 10.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ISCMF is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RLY.
RLY has the higher dividend yield at 3.07%, compared with 0.00% for ISCMF.
ISCMF is categorized as Commodities, while RLY is Global Allocation. ISCMF tracks Bloomberg Commodity Index, while RLY tracks Bloomberg U.S. Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ISCMF and 0.50% for RLY.
RLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ISCMF and RLY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer