PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISCMF vs. CMDY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISCMF vs. CMDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF) and iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISCMF achieves a 22.87% return, which is significantly lower than CMDY's 25.44% return.


ISCMF

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.67%
YTD
22.87%
6M
27.76%
1Y
37.85%
3Y*
15.20%
5Y*
10Y*

CMDY

1D
0.02%
1M
-2.52%
YTD
25.44%
6M
24.53%
1Y
37.10%
3Y*
15.48%
5Y*
10.71%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISCMF vs. CMDY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ISCMF
iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF
22.87%19.65%3.13%-9.58%-5.08%
CMDY
iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF
25.44%15.81%5.43%-9.33%-6.41%

Correlation

The correlation between ISCMF and CMDY is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2022

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISCMF vs. CMDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISCMF
ISCMF Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
ISCMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISCMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISCMF Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
ISCMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISCMF Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

CMDY
CMDY Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
CMDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMDY Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
CMDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMDY Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISCMF vs. CMDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF) and iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ISCMFCMDYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.05

2.32

-0.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.74

2.93

+0.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

2.53

1.42

+1.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.69

4.82

+1.86

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.68

14.50

+1.18

ISCMF vs. CMDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISCMF Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the CMDY Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISCMF and CMDY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ISCMFCMDYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05

2.32

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.56

-0.11

Drawdowns

ISCMF vs. CMDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISCMF drawdown since its inception was -25.42%, smaller than the maximum CMDY drawdown of -31.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISCMF and CMDY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISCMFCMDYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.42%

-31.19%

+5.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.69%

-7.73%

+2.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.62%

-10.08%

+2.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.26%

-3.97%

-1.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.43%

-13.14%

-0.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.42%

2.57%

-0.15%

Volatility

ISCMF vs. CMDY - Volatility Comparison

iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF) has a higher volatility of 7.14% compared to iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY) at 5.04%. This indicates that ISCMF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISCMFCMDYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.14%

5.04%

+2.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.90%

14.20%

+1.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.53%

16.06%

+2.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.38%

15.80%

-1.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.38%

14.63%

-0.25%

ISCMF vs. CMDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISCMF has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than CMDY's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

ISCMF vs. CMDY - Dividend Comparison

ISCMF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CMDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.28%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CMDY
iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF
10.28%12.89%4.23%5.10%3.98%16.09%0.15%2.21%1.73%
ISCMF
iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ISCMF and CMDY have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ISCMF has higher volatility (7.14%) compared to CMDY (5.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISCMF dropped -25.42% vs CMDY's -31.19%.

On 3-year performance, CMDY leads with 15.48% vs 15.20% for ISCMF. On fees, ISCMF is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, CMDY has been the lower-risk option at 5.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, CMDY has performed better with a 15.48% return vs 15.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ISCMF is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for CMDY.

CMDY has the higher dividend yield at 10.28%, compared with 0.00% for ISCMF.

ISCMF tracks Bloomberg Commodity Index, while CMDY tracks Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ISCMF and 0.28% for CMDY.

CMDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISCMF and CMDY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer