ISCF vs. FNDC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ISCF (iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF) and FNDC (Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF) are both Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities funds - ISCF tracks the MSCI World exUSA SmallCap Diversified Multi-Factor while FNDC tracks the Russell RAFI Small Company Developed x US. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ISCF returned 9.19%/yr vs 8.66%/yr for FNDC. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ISCF charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for FNDC.

Performance

ISCF vs. FNDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (ISCF) and Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISCF achieves a 7.28% return, which is significantly lower than FNDC's 11.36% return. Over the past 10 years, ISCF has outperformed FNDC with an annualized return of 9.19%, while FNDC has yielded a comparatively lower 8.66% annualized return.

ISCF

• 1D: -1.13%
• 1M: 1.65%
• YTD: 7.28%
• 6M: 10.16%
• 1Y: 21.96%
• 3Y*: 17.40%
• 5Y*: 7.26%
• 10Y*: 9.19%

FNDC

• 1D: -0.64%
• 1M: 1.12%
• YTD: 11.36%
• 6M: 13.51%
• 1Y: 27.62%
• 3Y*: 18.14%
• 5Y*: 7.17%
• 10Y*: 8.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISCF vs. FNDC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ISCF iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF	7.28%	33.65%	4.75%	11.50%	-15.07%	13.31%	7.65%	26.32%	-18.76%	38.13%
FNDC Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF	11.36%	35.65%	1.38%	14.92%	-14.71%	10.26%	6.58%	20.58%	-19.10%	29.22%

Correlation

The correlation between ISCF and FNDC is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2015	0.87

The correlation between ISCF and FNDC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

ISCF vs. FNDC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ISCF	FNDC
Industrials	23.3%	25.8%
Consumer Cyclical	12.4%	12.8%
Financial Services	12.3%	11.5%
Basic Materials	11.2%	11.0%
Technology	10.5%	8.7%
Real Estate	8.8%	6.9%
Healthcare	5.4%	4.9%
Energy	4.8%	4.6%
Consumer Defensive	4.1%	6.3%
Communication Services	3.8%	4.8%
Utilities	3.6%	2.8%

Return for Risk

ISCF vs. FNDC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISCF

ISCF Risk / Return Rank: 42
ISCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
ISCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
ISCF Omega Ratio Rank: 42
ISCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
ISCF Martin Ratio Rank: 44

FNDC

FNDC Risk / Return Rank: 54
FNDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
FNDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
FNDC Omega Ratio Rank: 56
FNDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
FNDC Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISCF vs. FNDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (ISCF) and Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ISCF	FNDC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.54	1.95	-0.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.18	2.75	-0.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.35	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.94	2.48	-0.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.28	9.29	-2.01
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ISCF vs. FNDC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISCF Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the FNDC Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISCF and FNDC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ISCF	FNDC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.54	1.95	-0.41
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44	0.45	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.53	0.52	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	0.50	-0.01

Drawdowns

ISCF vs. FNDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISCF drawdown since its inception was -40.79%, smaller than the maximum FNDC drawdown of -43.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISCF and FNDC.

Drawdown Indicators

	ISCF	FNDC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.79%	-43.22%	+2.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.34%	-11.20%	-0.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.85%	-12.98%	-0.87%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.70%	-32.13%	+1.43%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.79%	-43.22%	+2.43%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.64%	-2.09%	-0.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.14%	-8.45%	+0.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.02%	2.98%	+0.04%

Volatility

ISCF vs. FNDC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (ISCF) is 4.33%, while Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC) has a volatility of 4.67%. This indicates that ISCF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ISCF	FNDC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.33%	4.67%	-0.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.86%	11.77%	+0.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.39%	14.26%	+0.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.66%	15.98%	+0.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.44%	16.80%	+0.64%

ISCF vs. FNDC - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISCF has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDC's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

ISCF vs. FNDC - Dividend Comparison

ISCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, more than FNDC's 3.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNDC Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF	3.46%	3.86%	3.59%	2.86%	1.98%	2.58%	1.77%	2.71%	2.68%	1.94%	1.95%	1.30%
ISCF iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF	3.50%	3.76%	4.29%	3.94%	2.73%	3.93%	2.30%	2.87%	2.14%	1.97%	2.89%	1.46%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ISCF and FNDC in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, ISCF and FNDC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, ISCF or FNDC?

FNDC has higher volatility (4.67%) compared to ISCF (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISCF dropped -40.79% vs FNDC's -43.22%.

Which ETF is better, ISCF or FNDC?

On 10-year performance, ISCF leads with 9.19% vs 8.66% for FNDC. On fees, FNDC is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, ISCF has been the lower-risk option at 4.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ISCF or FNDC?

Over the 10-year period, ISCF has performed better with a 9.19% return vs 8.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ISCF or FNDC?

FNDC is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for ISCF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ISCF or FNDC?

ISCF has the higher dividend yield at 3.50%, compared with 3.46% for FNDC.

What is the main difference between ISCF and FNDC?

ISCF tracks MSCI World exUSA SmallCap Diversified Multi-Factor, while FNDC tracks Russell RAFI Small Company Developed x US. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for ISCF and 0.39% for FNDC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNDC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.