ISCF vs. FNDC

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (ISCF) and Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC).

ISCF and FNDC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ISCF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World exUSA SmallCap Diversified Multi-Factor. It was launched on Apr 28, 2015. FNDC is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell RAFI Small Company Developed x US. It was launched on Aug 15, 2013. Both ISCF and FNDC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

ISCF vs. FNDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (ISCF) and Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ISCF vs. FNDC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ISCF iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF	2.60%	33.65%	4.75%	11.50%	-15.07%	13.31%	7.65%	26.32%	-18.76%	38.13%
FNDC Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF	5.54%	35.65%	1.38%	14.92%	-14.71%	10.26%	6.58%	20.58%	-19.10%	29.22%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISCF achieves a 2.60% return, which is significantly lower than FNDC's 5.54% return. Over the past 10 years, ISCF has outperformed FNDC with an annualized return of 9.23%, while FNDC has yielded a comparatively lower 8.69% annualized return.

ISCF

• 1D: 1.84%
• 1M: -5.49%
• YTD: 2.60%
• 6M: 5.42%
• 1Y: 31.31%
• 3Y*: 15.63%
• 5Y*: 7.63%
• 10Y*: 9.23%

FNDC

• 1D: 1.42%
• 1M: -5.37%
• YTD: 5.54%
• 6M: 9.06%
• 1Y: 34.69%
• 3Y*: 16.32%
• 5Y*: 7.55%
• 10Y*: 8.69%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISCF vs. FNDC - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISCF has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDC's 0.39% expense ratio.

ISCF

iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF

FNDC

Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF

Return for Risk

ISCF vs. FNDC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISCF

ISCF Risk / Return Rank: 87
ISCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
ISCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
ISCF Omega Ratio Rank: 88
ISCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
ISCF Martin Ratio Rank: 86

FNDC

FNDC Risk / Return Rank: 92
FNDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
FNDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
FNDC Omega Ratio Rank: 93
FNDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
FNDC Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISCF vs. FNDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (ISCF) and Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ISCF	FNDC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.85	2.19	-0.35
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.49	2.99	-0.50
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.44	-0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.77	3.13	-0.36
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.60	12.02	-1.42
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ISCF vs. FNDC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISCF Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the FNDC Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISCF and FNDC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ISCF	FNDC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.85	2.19	-0.35
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46	0.48	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.53	0.52	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	0.48	-0.01

Correlation

The correlation between ISCF and FNDC is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

ISCF vs. FNDC - Dividend Comparison

ISCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.66%, which matches FNDC's 3.66% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ISCF iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF	3.66%	3.76%	4.29%	3.94%	2.73%	3.93%	2.30%	2.87%	2.14%	1.97%	2.89%	1.46%
FNDC Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF	3.66%	3.86%	3.59%	2.86%	1.98%	2.58%	1.77%	2.71%	2.68%	1.94%	1.95%	1.30%

Drawdowns

ISCF vs. FNDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISCF drawdown since its inception was -40.79%, smaller than the maximum FNDC drawdown of -43.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISCF and FNDC.

Drawdown Indicators

	ISCF	FNDC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.79%	-43.22%	+2.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.34%	-11.20%	-0.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.70%	-32.13%	+1.43%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.79%	-43.22%	+2.43%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.88%	-6.95%	+0.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.23%	-8.53%	+0.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.96%	2.91%	+0.05%

Volatility

ISCF vs. FNDC - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (ISCF) has a higher volatility of 7.11% compared to Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC) at 6.60%. This indicates that ISCF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ISCF	FNDC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.11%	6.60%	+0.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.95%	10.39%	+0.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.01%	15.88%	+1.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.53%	15.83%	+0.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.33%	16.72%	+0.61%