ISCB vs. SEIS
ISCB (iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF) and SEIS (SEI Select Small Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. ISCB is passively managed, while SEIS is actively managed. Over the past year, ISCB returned 29.48% vs 28.28% for SEIS. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. ISCB charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for SEIS.
Performance
ISCB vs. SEIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISCB achieves a 11.43% return, which is significantly lower than SEIS's 13.79% return.
ISCB
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 2.77%
- YTD
- 11.43%
- 6M
- 11.42%
- 1Y
- 29.48%
- 3Y*
- 16.41%
- 5Y*
- 5.72%
- 10Y*
- 9.30%
SEIS
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 2.34%
- YTD
- 13.79%
- 6M
- 13.11%
- 1Y
- 28.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISCB vs. SEIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ISCB iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF | 11.43% | 12.46% | 1.93% |
SEIS SEI Select Small Cap ETF | 13.79% | 9.81% | 1.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISCB and SEIS is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2024 | 0.95 |
The correlation between ISCB and SEIS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISCB vs. SEIS — Risk / Return Rank
ISCB
SEIS
ISCB vs. SEIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF (ISCB) and SEI Select Small Cap ETF (SEIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ISCB | SEIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.26 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.15 | 2.54 | +0.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.26 | 8.43 | +2.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ISCB | SEIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.80 | 1.50 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.70 | -0.32 |
Drawdowns
ISCB vs. SEIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISCB drawdown since its inception was -61.25%, which is greater than SEIS's maximum drawdown of -26.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISCB and SEIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISCB | SEIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.25% | -26.08% | -35.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.39% | -11.18% | +1.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.18% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.67% | -0.67% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.80% | -6.00% | -3.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.63% | 3.36% | -0.73% |
Volatility
ISCB vs. SEIS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF (ISCB) is 4.28%, while SEI Select Small Cap ETF (SEIS) has a volatility of 5.42%. This indicates that ISCB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISCB | SEIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.28% | 5.42% | -1.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.43% | 13.72% | -2.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.51% | 18.89% | -2.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.39% | 22.11% | -0.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.68% | 22.11% | +0.57% |
ISCB vs. SEIS - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISCB has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than SEIS's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISCB vs. SEIS - Dividend Comparison
ISCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, more than SEIS's 0.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISCB iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF | 1.27% | 1.38% | 1.31% | 1.49% | 1.63% | 1.26% | 1.26% | 1.25% | 1.60% | 1.24% | 1.58% | 1.40% |
SEIS SEI Select Small Cap ETF | 0.37% | 0.59% | 0.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, ISCB and SEIS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SEIS has higher volatility (5.42%) compared to ISCB (4.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISCB dropped -61.25% vs SEIS's -26.08%.
On 1-year performance, ISCB leads with 29.48% vs 28.28% for SEIS. On fees, ISCB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, ISCB has been the lower-risk option at 4.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ISCB has performed better with a 29.48% return vs 28.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ISCB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for SEIS.
ISCB has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 0.37% for SEIS.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and SEI. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for ISCB and 0.55% for SEIS.
ISCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ISCB and SEIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer