PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISCB vs. IBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISCB vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF (ISCB) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISCB achieves a 14.59% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -29.06% return.


ISCB

1D
-0.54%
1M
0.95%
6M
9.05%
YTD
14.59%
1Y
25.73%
3Y*
14.90%
5Y*
7.28%
10Y*
9.20%

IBIT

1D
-2.79%
1M
-2.28%
6M
-32.10%
YTD
-29.06%
1Y
-47.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISCB vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ISCB
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF
14.59%12.46%13.57%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
-29.06%-6.41%89.87%

Correlation

The correlation between ISCB and IBIT is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISCB vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISCB
ISCB Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
ISCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISCB Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
ISCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISCB Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIT
IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISCB vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF (ISCB) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ISCBIBITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

0.82

+0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

-0.90

+3.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.82

-1.46

+11.28

ISCB vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISCB Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is higher than the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISCB and IBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ISCB vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISCB drawdown since its inception was -61.25%, which is greater than IBIT's maximum drawdown of -53.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISCB and IBIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISCBIBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.25%

-53.30%

-7.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.39%

-53.30%

+43.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.91%

-50.60%

+48.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.76%

-17.56%

+7.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

32.72%

-30.09%

Volatility

ISCB vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF (ISCB) is 4.00%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 11.51%. This indicates that ISCB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISCBIBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.00%

11.51%

-7.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.58%

34.79%

-23.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.59%

44.38%

-27.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.37%

49.97%

-28.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.61%

49.97%

-27.36%

ISCB vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISCB has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ISCB vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

ISCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ISCB
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF
1.29%1.38%1.31%1.49%1.63%1.26%1.26%1.25%1.60%1.24%1.58%1.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


ISCB and IBIT have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBIT has higher volatility (11.51%) compared to ISCB (4.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISCB dropped -61.25% vs IBIT's -53.30%.

On 1-year performance, ISCB leads with 25.73% vs -47.60% for IBIT. On fees, ISCB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, ISCB has been the lower-risk option at 4.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ISCB has performed better with a 25.73% return vs -47.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ISCB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IBIT.

ISCB has the higher dividend yield at 1.29%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.

ISCB is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. ISCB tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Extended Index, while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for ISCB and 0.25% for IBIT.

ISCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs -1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISCB and IBIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer