ISCB vs. ASCE

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

ISCB (iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF) and ASCE (Allspring SMID Core ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. ISCB is passively managed, while ASCE is actively managed. Over the past year, ISCB returned 27.83% vs 38.53% for ASCE. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ISCB charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for ASCE.

Performance

ISCB vs. ASCE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF (ISCB) and Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISCB achieves a 15.70% return, which is significantly lower than ASCE's 26.69% return.

ISCB

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: 2.04%
• 6M: 8.75%
• YTD: 15.70%
• 1Y: 27.83%
• 3Y*: 14.97%
• 5Y*: 7.86%
• 10Y*: 9.28%

ASCE

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: -2.74%
• 6M: 19.06%
• YTD: 26.69%
• 1Y: 38.53%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISCB vs. ASCE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ISCB iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF	15.70%	10.73%
ASCE Allspring SMID Core ETF	26.69%	8.46%

Correlation

The correlation between ISCB and ASCE is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2025	0.89

The correlation between ISCB and ASCE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ISCB vs. ASCE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISCB

ISCB Risk / Return Rank: 68
ISCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
ISCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
ISCB Omega Ratio Rank: 60
ISCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
ISCB Martin Ratio Rank: 73

ASCE

ASCE Risk / Return Rank: 79
ASCE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
ASCE Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
ASCE Omega Ratio Rank: 69
ASCE Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
ASCE Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISCB vs. ASCE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF (ISCB) and Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ISCB	ASCE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.70	1.96	-0.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.48	2.83	-0.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.33	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.98	4.20	-1.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.62	13.04	-2.42

ISCB vs. ASCE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISCB Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the ASCE Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISCB and ASCE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ISCB vs. ASCE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISCB drawdown since its inception was -61.25%, which is greater than ASCE's maximum drawdown of -9.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISCB and ASCE.

Drawdown Indicators

	ISCB	ASCE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.25%	-9.22%	-52.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.39%	-9.22%	-0.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.22%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.94%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.18%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.96%	-3.49%	+2.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.75%	-2.04%	-7.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.63%	2.96%	-0.33%

Volatility

ISCB vs. ASCE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF (ISCB) is 3.27%, while Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE) has a volatility of 6.22%. This indicates that ISCB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASCE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ISCB	ASCE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.27%	6.22%	-2.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.57%	14.96%	-3.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.46%	19.70%	-3.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.35%	19.60%	+1.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.60%	19.60%	+3.00%

ISCB vs. ASCE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISCB has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than ASCE's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

ISCB vs. ASCE - Dividend Comparison

ISCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, more than ASCE's 0.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASCE Allspring SMID Core ETF	0.17%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ISCB iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF	1.27%	1.38%	1.31%	1.49%	1.63%	1.26%	1.26%	1.25%	1.60%	1.24%	1.58%	1.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ISCB and ASCE in my portfolio?

ISCB and ASCE have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ISCB or ASCE?

ASCE has higher volatility (6.22%) compared to ISCB (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISCB dropped -61.25% vs ASCE's -9.22%.

Which ETF is better, ISCB or ASCE?

On 1-year performance, ASCE leads with 38.53% vs 27.83% for ISCB. On fees, ISCB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, ISCB has been the lower-risk option at 3.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ISCB or ASCE?

Over the 1-year period, ASCE has performed better with a 38.53% return vs 27.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ISCB or ASCE?

ISCB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for ASCE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ISCB or ASCE?

ISCB has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 0.17% for ASCE.

What is the main difference between ISCB and ASCE?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Allspring. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for ISCB and 0.38% for ASCE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ASCE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.