ISAC.L vs. WRDA.L
ISAC.L (iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and WRDA.L (UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both Global Equities funds - ISAC.L tracks the MSCI ACWI Index while WRDA.L tracks the MSCI World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ISAC.L returned 28.81% vs 26.21% for WRDA.L. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ISAC.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for WRDA.L.
Performance
ISAC.L vs. WRDA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ISAC.L is traded in USD, while WRDA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the WRDA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISAC.L achieves a 11.54% return, which is significantly higher than WRDA.L's 9.89% return.
ISAC.L
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 4.26%
- YTD
- 11.54%
- 6M
- 13.01%
- 1Y
- 28.81%
- 3Y*
- 21.19%
- 5Y*
- 11.38%
- 10Y*
- 12.63%
WRDA.L
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 4.24%
- YTD
- 9.89%
- 6M
- 11.23%
- 1Y
- 26.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISAC.L vs. WRDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ISAC.L iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 11.54% | 22.36% | 17.20% |
WRDA.L UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc | 9.89% | 21.28% | 17.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISAC.L and WRDA.L is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2024 | 0.93 |
The correlation between ISAC.L and WRDA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISAC.L vs. WRDA.L — Risk / Return Rank
ISAC.L
WRDA.L
ISAC.L vs. WRDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L) and UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ISAC.L | WRDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.42 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.27 | 3.03 | +0.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.72 | 13.34 | +0.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ISAC.L | WRDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.31 | 2.33 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 1.60 | -0.85 |
Drawdowns
ISAC.L vs. WRDA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISAC.L drawdown since its inception was -33.82%, which is greater than WRDA.L's maximum drawdown of -16.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISAC.L and WRDA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISAC.L | WRDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.82% | -16.63% | -17.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.77% | -8.60% | -0.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.72% | -0.43% | -0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.69% | -1.67% | -3.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.10% | 1.96% | +0.14% |
Volatility
ISAC.L vs. WRDA.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L) has a higher volatility of 3.84% compared to UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRDA.L) at 2.69%. This indicates that ISAC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WRDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISAC.L | WRDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.84% | 2.69% | +1.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.77% | 8.39% | +1.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.40% | 11.21% | +1.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.57% | 13.29% | +2.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.95% | 13.29% | +2.66% |
ISAC.L vs. WRDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISAC.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than WRDA.L's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ISAC.L vs. WRDA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ISAC.L nor WRDA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, ISAC.L and WRDA.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, WRDA.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WRDA.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ISAC.L.
ISAC.L tracks MSCI ACWI Index, while WRDA.L tracks MSCI World Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ISAC.L and 0.06% for WRDA.L.
Find the right allocation for ISAC.L and WRDA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer