PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IS3N.DE vs. AGGH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IS3N.DE vs. AGGH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) and Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IS3N.DE is traded in EUR, while AGGH is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AGGH values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IS3N.DE achieves a 26.75% return, which is significantly higher than AGGH's 2.17% return.


IS3N.DE

1D
-1.02%
1M
5.90%
YTD
26.75%
6M
30.88%
1Y
45.63%
3Y*
19.41%
5Y*
8.65%
10Y*
10.33%

AGGH

1D
-0.03%
1M
1.45%
YTD
2.17%
6M
2.27%
1Y
8.99%
3Y*
2.87%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IS3N.DE vs. AGGH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IS3N.DE
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)
26.75%17.14%13.88%7.20%-13.71%
AGGH
Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF
2.17%-4.61%8.71%5.22%-3.21%

Correlation

The correlation between IS3N.DE and AGGH is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2022

-0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IS3N.DE vs. AGGH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IS3N.DE
IS3N.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
IS3N.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

AGGH
AGGH Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
AGGH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGGH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGGH Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
AGGH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGGH Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IS3N.DE vs. AGGH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) and Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IS3N.DEAGGHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.22

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.32

2.33

+1.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.01

7.03

+7.98

IS3N.DE vs. AGGH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IS3N.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is higher than the AGGH Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IS3N.DE and AGGH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IS3N.DE vs. AGGH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IS3N.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.06%, which is greater than AGGH's maximum drawdown of -13.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IS3N.DE and AGGH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IS3N.DEAGGHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.06%

-13.87%

-21.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.52%

-3.87%

-6.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.18%

-13.87%

-5.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.76%

-5.87%

+4.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.26%

-6.28%

-2.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

1.28%

+1.75%

Volatility

IS3N.DE vs. AGGH - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.11% compared to Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH) at 0.77%. This indicates that IS3N.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGGH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IS3N.DEAGGHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.11%

0.77%

+6.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.75%

4.60%

+11.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.12%

7.81%

+10.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.39%

10.45%

+5.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.10%

10.45%

+7.65%

IS3N.DE vs. AGGH - Expense Ratio Comparison

IS3N.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than AGGH's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

IS3N.DE vs. AGGH - Dividend Comparison

IS3N.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AGGH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.49%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
AGGH
Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF
7.49%7.54%8.97%9.51%2.11%
IS3N.DE
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IS3N.DE and AGGH have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IS3N.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IS3N.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for AGGH.

IS3N.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while AGGH is Intermediate Core Bond. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IS3N.DE and 0.33% for AGGH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IS3N.DE and AGGH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer