IRTR vs. PRPFX
IRTR (Ishares Lifepath Retirement ETF) and PRPFX (Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio) are both funds - IRTR is a Target Retirement Date fund actively managed by iShares, while PRPFX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Permanent Portfolio. Over the past year, IRTR returned 13.84% vs 23.21% for PRPFX. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IRTR charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.81%/yr for PRPFX.
Performance
IRTR vs. PRPFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IRTR achieves a 5.36% return, which is significantly lower than PRPFX's 6.75% return.
IRTR
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 1.82%
- YTD
- 5.36%
- 6M
- 5.66%
- 1Y
- 13.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PRPFX
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- YTD
- 6.75%
- 6M
- 9.08%
- 1Y
- 23.21%
- 3Y*
- 21.47%
- 5Y*
- 11.56%
- 10Y*
- 11.06%
IRTR vs. PRPFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IRTR Ishares Lifepath Retirement ETF | 5.36% | 12.70% | 7.59% | 10.63% |
PRPFX Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio | 6.75% | 28.78% | 19.36% | 6.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between IRTR and PRPFX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2023 | 0.63 |
The correlation between IRTR and PRPFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IRTR vs. PRPFX — Risk / Return Rank
IRTR
PRPFX
IRTR vs. PRPFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares Lifepath Retirement ETF (IRTR) and Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio (PRPFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IRTR | PRPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.39 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.88 | 2.91 | -0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.70 | 8.07 | +4.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IRTR | PRPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.32 | 1.89 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.02 | 0.80 | +1.22 |
Drawdowns
IRTR vs. PRPFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IRTR drawdown since its inception was -6.29%, smaller than the maximum PRPFX drawdown of -27.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRTR and PRPFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IRTR | PRPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.29% | -27.16% | +20.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.82% | -8.10% | +3.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -8.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -20.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.20% | -4.50% | +4.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.78% | -3.52% | +2.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.09% | 2.91% | -1.82% |
Volatility
IRTR vs. PRPFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ishares Lifepath Retirement ETF (IRTR) is 2.12%, while Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio (PRPFX) has a volatility of 2.64%. This indicates that IRTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRPFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IRTR | PRPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.12% | 2.64% | -0.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.85% | 11.21% | -6.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.00% | 12.45% | -6.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.03% | 11.05% | -4.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.03% | 10.61% | -3.58% |
IRTR vs. PRPFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IRTR has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than PRPFX's 0.81% expense ratio.
Dividends
IRTR vs. PRPFX - Dividend Comparison
IRTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, less than PRPFX's 3.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IRTR Ishares Lifepath Retirement ETF | 2.99% | 3.03% | 3.03% | 0.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PRPFX Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio | 3.06% | 3.27% | 1.86% | 1.39% | 1.58% | 2.05% | 5.38% | 4.69% | 6.90% | 2.14% | 0.95% | 7.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IRTR and PRPFX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PRPFX has higher volatility (2.64%) compared to IRTR (2.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IRTR dropped -6.29% vs PRPFX's -27.16%.
IRTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IRTR and PRPFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer