PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IRSQX vs. LTSTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IRSQX vs. LTSTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Target Retirement 2050 Fund (IRSQX) and Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund (LTSTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IRSQX achieves a 13.02% return, which is significantly higher than LTSTX's 5.20% return. Over the past 10 years, IRSQX has outperformed LTSTX with an annualized return of 11.97%, while LTSTX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.05% annualized return.


IRSQX

1D
0.40%
1M
5.64%
YTD
13.02%
6M
13.89%
1Y
29.66%
3Y*
20.11%
5Y*
10.53%
10Y*
11.97%

LTSTX

1D
0.17%
1M
2.49%
YTD
5.20%
6M
5.33%
1Y
13.74%
3Y*
12.33%
5Y*
5.67%
10Y*
8.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IRSQX vs. LTSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IRSQX
Voya Target Retirement 2050 Fund
13.02%20.71%15.32%20.47%-18.75%18.82%17.28%25.25%-9.37%20.99%
LTSTX
Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund
5.20%12.16%11.91%13.30%-15.23%10.91%13.70%20.50%-6.41%16.75%

Correlation

The correlation between IRSQX and LTSTX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 26, 2012

0.95

The correlation between IRSQX and LTSTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.84 (1 year) to 0.95 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IRSQX vs. LTSTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IRSQX
IRSQX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
IRSQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IRSQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
IRSQX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
IRSQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
IRSQX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

LTSTX
LTSTX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
LTSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
LTSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IRSQX vs. LTSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Target Retirement 2050 Fund (IRSQX) and Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund (LTSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IRSQXLTSTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.71

2.11

+0.60

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.87

3.05

+0.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.41

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.50

2.67

+0.83

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.89

12.06

+4.83

IRSQX vs. LTSTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IRSQX Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is comparable to the LTSTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IRSQX and LTSTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IRSQXLTSTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.71

2.11

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.62

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.82

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.48

+0.26

Drawdowns

IRSQX vs. LTSTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IRSQX drawdown since its inception was -33.06%, smaller than the maximum LTSTX drawdown of -48.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRSQX and LTSTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IRSQXLTSTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.06%

-48.17%

+15.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.42%

-5.24%

-4.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.91%

-8.12%

-7.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.14%

-21.01%

-5.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.06%

-23.33%

-9.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.49%

-6.16%

+1.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

1.16%

+0.72%

Volatility

IRSQX vs. LTSTX - Volatility Comparison

Voya Target Retirement 2050 Fund (IRSQX) has a higher volatility of 3.67% compared to Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund (LTSTX) at 2.02%. This indicates that IRSQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LTSTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IRSQXLTSTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.67%

2.02%

+1.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.96%

5.39%

+4.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.17%

6.64%

+5.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.30%

9.18%

+6.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.15%

9.83%

+6.32%

IRSQX vs. LTSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IRSQX has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than LTSTX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IRSQX vs. LTSTX - Dividend Comparison

IRSQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.10%, more than LTSTX's 11.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IRSQX
Voya Target Retirement 2050 Fund
14.10%15.94%1.93%1.89%6.50%20.41%2.18%4.80%7.33%6.29%1.94%0.44%
LTSTX
Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund
11.59%12.19%9.74%4.26%8.00%7.66%5.25%6.91%6.39%4.75%3.65%8.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


IRSQX and LTSTX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IRSQX has higher volatility (3.67%) compared to LTSTX (2.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IRSQX dropped -33.06% vs LTSTX's -48.17%.

IRSQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IRSQX and LTSTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer