PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IRSQX vs. IRLNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IRSQX vs. IRLNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Target Retirement 2050 Fund (IRSQX) and Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio (IRLNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IRSQX achieves a 10.20% return, which is significantly higher than IRLNX's 1.76% return. Over the past 10 years, IRSQX has underperformed IRLNX with an annualized return of 12.09%, while IRLNX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.93% annualized return.


IRSQX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.32%
YTD
10.20%
6M
9.28%
1Y
23.99%
3Y*
18.81%
5Y*
9.67%
10Y*
12.09%

IRLNX

1D
-0.23%
1M
-4.95%
YTD
1.76%
6M
0.32%
1Y
17.00%
3Y*
22.26%
5Y*
14.03%
10Y*
18.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IRSQX vs. IRLNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IRSQX
Voya Target Retirement 2050 Fund
10.20%20.71%15.32%20.47%-18.75%18.82%17.28%25.25%-9.37%20.99%
IRLNX
Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio
1.76%18.20%34.60%46.01%-30.06%30.63%38.32%35.61%-2.02%31.27%

Correlation

The correlation between IRSQX and IRLNX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2012

0.85

The correlation between IRSQX and IRLNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IRSQX vs. IRLNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IRSQX
IRSQX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
IRSQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IRSQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
IRSQX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
IRSQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
IRSQX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

IRLNX
IRLNX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
IRLNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IRLNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
IRLNX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
IRLNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
IRLNX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IRSQX vs. IRLNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Target Retirement 2050 Fund (IRSQX) and Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio (IRLNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IRSQXIRLNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.20

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

1.16

+1.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.90

3.56

+9.34

IRSQX vs. IRLNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IRSQX Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is higher than the IRLNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IRSQX and IRLNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IRSQX vs. IRLNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IRSQX drawdown since its inception was -33.06%, roughly equal to the maximum IRLNX drawdown of -32.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRSQX and IRLNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IRSQXIRLNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.06%

-32.90%

-0.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.42%

-16.64%

+7.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.91%

-23.31%

+7.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.14%

-32.90%

+6.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.06%

-32.90%

-0.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.50%

-7.31%

+4.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.48%

-4.74%

+0.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

5.17%

-3.22%

Volatility

IRSQX vs. IRLNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Voya Target Retirement 2050 Fund (IRSQX) is 5.24%, while Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio (IRLNX) has a volatility of 6.11%. This indicates that IRSQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IRLNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IRSQXIRLNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.24%

6.11%

-0.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.63%

13.31%

-2.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.04%

17.14%

-4.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.43%

22.13%

-6.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.14%

21.49%

-5.35%

IRSQX vs. IRLNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IRSQX has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than IRLNX's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

IRSQX vs. IRLNX - Dividend Comparison

IRSQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.46%, less than IRLNX's 20.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IRLNX
Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio
20.29%9.54%3.55%4.60%11.22%0.83%4.18%4.95%3.70%0.99%1.23%1.14%
IRSQX
Voya Target Retirement 2050 Fund
14.46%15.94%1.93%1.89%6.50%20.41%2.18%4.80%7.33%6.29%1.94%0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


IRSQX and IRLNX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IRLNX has higher volatility (6.11%) compared to IRSQX (5.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IRSQX dropped -33.06% vs IRLNX's -32.90%.

IRSQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IRSQX and IRLNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer