IRS vs. ILF
IRS (IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones Sociedad Anónima) is a stock, while ILF (iShares Latin American 40 ETF) is Latin America Equities fund tracking the S&P Latin America 40 Index. Over the past 10 years, IRS returned 5.41%/yr vs 8.33%/yr for ILF. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IRS vs. ILF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IRS achieves a -10.28% return, which is significantly lower than ILF's 11.66% return. Over the past 10 years, IRS has underperformed ILF with an annualized return of 5.41%, while ILF has yielded a comparatively higher 8.33% annualized return.
IRS
- 1D
- -1.98%
- 1M
- 5.55%
- YTD
- -10.28%
- 6M
- -3.39%
- 1Y
- 6.95%
- 3Y*
- 47.83%
- 5Y*
- 41.28%
- 10Y*
- 5.41%
ILF
- 1D
- -2.72%
- 1M
- -4.92%
- YTD
- 11.66%
- 6M
- 10.51%
- 1Y
- 39.82%
- 3Y*
- 15.62%
- 5Y*
- 8.53%
- 10Y*
- 8.33%
IRS vs. ILF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IRS IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones Sociedad Anónima | -10.28% | 21.60% | 103.74% | 99.57% | 17.65% | -5.54% | -33.08% | -45.90% | -53.72% | 76.69% |
ILF iShares Latin American 40 ETF | 11.66% | 52.65% | -23.11% | 33.14% | 9.81% | -13.59% | -11.71% | 13.77% | -6.85% | 26.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between IRS and ILF is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2001 | 0.31 |
The correlation between IRS and ILF shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (all time) to 0.42 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IRS vs. ILF — Risk / Return Rank
IRS
ILF
IRS vs. ILF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones Sociedad Anónima (IRS) and iShares Latin American 40 ETF (ILF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IRS | ILF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.31 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.23 | 3.16 | -2.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.46 | 9.70 | -9.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IRS | ILF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 | 1.84 | -1.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | 0.37 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 | 0.29 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.03 | 0.30 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
IRS vs. ILF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IRS drawdown since its inception was -92.99%, which is greater than ILF's maximum drawdown of -67.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRS and ILF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IRS | ILF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.99% | -67.48% | -25.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.64% | -12.67% | -17.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.01% | -23.97% | -11.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.93% | -29.71% | -8.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -91.24% | -57.79% | -33.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.99% | -10.76% | -13.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.45% | -23.94% | -33.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.23% | 4.12% | +11.11% |
Volatility
IRS vs. ILF - Volatility Comparison
IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones Sociedad Anónima (IRS) has a higher volatility of 13.60% compared to iShares Latin American 40 ETF (ILF) at 6.49%. This indicates that IRS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ILF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IRS | ILF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.60% | 6.49% | +7.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.35% | 18.52% | +9.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.19% | 21.76% | +31.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.91% | 23.18% | +26.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.61% | 28.44% | +25.17% |
Dividends
IRS vs. ILF - Dividend Comparison
IRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.54%, more than ILF's 3.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILF iShares Latin American 40 ETF | 3.93% | 4.39% | 7.44% | 4.61% | 12.72% | 8.47% | 1.88% | 3.09% | 3.12% | 1.80% | 1.59% | 3.25% |
IRS IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones Sociedad Anónima | 9.54% | 8.56% | 10.79% | 18.63% | 3.91% | 0.00% | 1.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IRS and ILF have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IRS has higher volatility (13.60%) compared to ILF (6.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IRS dropped -92.99% vs ILF's -67.48%.
ILF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IRS and ILF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer