ILF vs. FLLA
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Latin American 40 ETF (ILF) and Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF (FLLA).
ILF and FLLA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ILF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Latin America 40 Index. It was launched on Oct 25, 2001. FLLA is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the FTSE Latin America RIC Capped Index. It was launched on Oct 9, 2018. Both ILF and FLLA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ILF vs. FLLA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ILF vs. FLLA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILF iShares Latin American 40 ETF | 16.65% | 52.65% | -23.11% | 33.14% | 9.81% | -13.59% | -11.71% | 13.77% | -4.69% |
FLLA Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF | 17.39% | 51.81% | -26.89% | 32.71% | 7.78% | -8.93% | -15.08% | 19.59% | -2.78% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ILF having a 16.65% return and FLLA slightly higher at 17.39%.
ILF
- 1D
- 4.41%
- 1M
- -2.63%
- YTD
- 16.65%
- 6M
- 25.92%
- 1Y
- 58.11%
- 3Y*
- 20.46%
- 5Y*
- 13.16%
- 10Y*
- 8.47%
FLLA
- 1D
- 3.89%
- 1M
- -2.95%
- YTD
- 17.39%
- 6M
- 25.40%
- 1Y
- 54.98%
- 3Y*
- 18.51%
- 5Y*
- 12.45%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ILF vs. FLLA - Expense Ratio Comparison
ILF has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than FLLA's 0.19% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ILF vs. FLLA — Risk / Return Rank
ILF
FLLA
ILF vs. FLLA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Latin American 40 ETF (ILF) and Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF (FLLA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ILF | FLLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.48 | 2.40 | +0.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.06 | 2.97 | +0.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.42 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.47 | 4.67 | -0.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.54 | 15.05 | +0.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ILF | FLLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.48 | 2.40 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.55 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.26 | +0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between ILF and FLLA is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ILF vs. FLLA - Dividend Comparison
ILF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%, less than FLLA's 5.16% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILF iShares Latin American 40 ETF | 3.76% | 4.39% | 7.44% | 4.61% | 12.72% | 8.47% | 1.88% | 3.09% | 3.12% | 1.80% | 1.59% | 3.25% |
FLLA Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF | 5.16% | 6.06% | 7.04% | 5.45% | 9.55% | 7.60% | 2.12% | 3.18% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ILF vs. FLLA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ILF drawdown since its inception was -67.48%, which is greater than FLLA's maximum drawdown of -53.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILF and FLLA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ILF | FLLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.48% | -53.88% | -13.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.67% | -11.59% | -1.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.71% | -28.32% | -1.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.82% | -4.01% | -0.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.07% | -13.69% | -10.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.65% | 3.59% | +0.06% |
Volatility
ILF vs. FLLA - Volatility Comparison
iShares Latin American 40 ETF (ILF) and Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF (FLLA) have volatilities of 11.60% and 11.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ILF | FLLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.60% | 11.50% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.90% | 17.21% | +0.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.59% | 23.04% | +0.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.24% | 22.80% | +0.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.59% | 27.66% | +0.93% |