ILF vs. EWW
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Latin American 40 ETF (ILF) and iShares MSCI Mexico ETF (EWW).
ILF and EWW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ILF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Latin America 40 Index. It was launched on Oct 25, 2001. EWW is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Mexico IMI 25/50 Index. It was launched on Mar 12, 1996. Both ILF and EWW are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ILF or EWW.
Performance
ILF vs. EWW - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ILF achieves a -14.76% return, which is significantly higher than EWW's -24.31% return. Over the past 10 years, ILF has outperformed EWW with an annualized return of -0.07%, while EWW has yielded a comparatively lower -0.56% annualized return.
ILF
-14.76%
-4.51%
-12.56%
-8.96%
0.49%
-0.07%
EWW
-24.31%
-5.69%
-24.09%
-17.04%
5.25%
-0.56%
Key characteristics
| ILF | EWW | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.43 | -0.66 |
| Sortino Ratio | -0.48 | -0.76 |
| Omega Ratio | 0.94 | 0.90 |
| Calmar Ratio | -0.25 | -0.57 |
| Martin Ratio | -0.87 | -1.05 |
| Ulcer Index | 8.58% | 15.22% |
| Daily Std Dev | 17.63% | 24.30% |
| Max Drawdown | -67.48% | -64.95% |
| Current Drawdown | -27.61% | -27.23% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ILF vs. EWW - Expense Ratio Comparison
ILF has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than EWW's 0.49% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between ILF and EWW is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ILF vs. EWW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Latin American 40 ETF (ILF) and iShares MSCI Mexico ETF (EWW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ILF vs. EWW - Dividend Comparison
ILF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.31%, more than EWW's 2.95% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILF iShares Latin American 40 ETF | 6.31% | 4.61% | 12.72% | 8.47% | 1.88% | 3.09% | 3.12% | 1.81% | 1.59% | 3.25% | 2.32% | 3.32% |
EWW iShares MSCI Mexico ETF | 2.95% | 2.19% | 3.64% | 2.06% | 1.43% | 2.92% | 2.30% | 2.22% | 1.77% | 2.34% | 1.23% | 1.96% |
Drawdowns
ILF vs. EWW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ILF drawdown since its inception was -67.48%, roughly equal to the maximum EWW drawdown of -64.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILF and EWW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ILF vs. EWW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Latin American 40 ETF (ILF) is 4.24%, while iShares MSCI Mexico ETF (EWW) has a volatility of 5.56%. This indicates that ILF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.