PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ILF vs. FLBR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ILF vs. FLBR

Last updated Aug 2, 2026
Documentation

ILF (iShares Latin American 40 ETF) and FLBR (Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF) are both Latin America Equities funds - ILF tracks the S&P Latin America 40 (Net) while FLBR tracks the FTSE Brazil RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ILF returned 11.24%/yr vs 8.65%/yr for FLBR. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. ILF charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLBR.

Performance

ILF vs. FLBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Latin American 40 ETF (ILF) and Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF (FLBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ILF achieves a 17.64% return, which is significantly lower than FLBR's 21.58% return.

ILF

1D
-0.03%
1M
4.99%
6M
1.31%
YTD
17.64%
1Y
48.11%
3Y*
14.00%
5Y*
11.24%
10Y*
7.78%
ALL TIME*
9.53%

FLBR

1D
0.88%
1M
6.92%
6M
3.21%
YTD
21.58%
1Y
46.09%
3Y*
11.91%
5Y*
8.65%
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
5.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

FLBR

Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF
$3.25M$2.48M$4.17M

ILF

iShares Latin American 40 ETF
$79.35M$71.98M$85.23M

ILF vs. FLBR - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ILF
iShares Latin American 40 ETF		17.64%52.65%-23.11%33.14%9.81%-13.59%-11.71%13.77%-6.85%3.00%
FLBR
Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF		21.58%45.57%-27.58%33.19%10.44%-16.78%-20.13%28.47%-2.13%2.27%

Correlation

The correlation between ILF and FLBR is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017

0.92

The correlation between ILF and FLBR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

ILF vs. FLBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
ILF
FLBR

Financial Services

34.5%
26.3%

Basic Materials

22.0%
15.6%

Energy

10.6%
17.8%

Consumer Defensive

9.6%
4.6%

Industrials

9.6%
12.4%

Communication Services

6.0%
1.8%

Utilities

4.7%
15.0%

Consumer Cyclical

1.3%
2.6%

Healthcare

1.1%
2.5%

Real Estate

0.8%
0.9%

Technology

-

0.7%

Financial Services

ILF
34.5%
FLBR
26.3%

Basic Materials

ILF
22.0%
FLBR
15.6%

Energy

ILF
10.6%
FLBR
17.8%

Consumer Defensive

ILF
9.6%
FLBR
4.6%

Industrials

ILF
9.6%
FLBR
12.4%

Communication Services

ILF
6.0%
FLBR
1.8%

Utilities

ILF
4.7%
FLBR
15.0%

Consumer Cyclical

ILF
1.3%
FLBR
2.6%

Healthcare

ILF
1.1%
FLBR
2.5%

Real Estate

ILF
0.8%
FLBR
0.9%

Technology

ILF

-

FLBR
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Latin American 40 ETF

Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF

Often compared with ILF:
ILF vs. EWZILF vs. FLLAILF vs. EWWILF vs. FLNILF vs. EPUILF vs. VOOILF vs. VOOG
Often compared with FLBR:
FLBR vs. EWZFLBR vs. FLLAFLBR vs. FLAUFLBR vs. USDFLBR vs. VOOFLBR vs. GALFLBR vs. BRF

Return for Risk

ILF vs. FLBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
ILF
ILF Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
ILF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILF Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
ILF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILF Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
FLBR
FLBR Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FLBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLBR Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FLBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLBR Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ILF vs. FLBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Latin American 40 ETF (ILF) and Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF (FLBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

ILFFLBRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.13
1.87

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.78
2.46

+0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.33

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.42

2.57

+0.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.81

6.14

+2.67

ILF vs. FLBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ILF Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the FLBR Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ILF and FLBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ILF vs. FLBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ILF drawdown since its inception was -67.48%, which is greater than FLBR's maximum drawdown of -57.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILF and FLBR.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ILFFLBRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.48%

-57.42%

-10.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.94%

-18.38%

+4.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.97%

-28.97%

+5.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.71%

-32.31%

+2.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.79%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.98%

-11.13%

+5.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.84%

-18.55%

-5.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.40%

7.68%

-2.28%

Volatility

ILF vs. FLBR - Volatility Comparison

iShares Latin American 40 ETF (ILF) and Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF (FLBR) have volatilities of 6.14% and 6.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ILFFLBRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.14%

6.42%

-0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.40%

19.42%

-1.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.44%

25.26%

-2.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.10%

27.46%

-4.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.26%

32.89%

-4.63%

ILF vs. FLBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

ILF has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than FLBR's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

ILF vs. FLBR - Dividend Comparison

ILF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, less than FLBR's 5.66% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLBR
Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF		5.66%7.71%7.68%8.84%11.99%8.71%2.32%3.42%3.72%0.42%0.00%0.00%
ILF
iShares Latin American 40 ETF		3.34%4.39%7.44%4.61%12.72%8.47%1.88%3.09%3.12%1.80%1.59%3.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 0.91, ILF and FLBR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FLBR has higher volatility (6.42%) compared to ILF (6.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ILF dropped -67.48% vs FLBR's -57.42%.

On 5-year performance, ILF leads with 11.24% vs 8.65% for FLBR. On fees, FLBR is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, ILF has been the lower-risk option at 6.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ILF has performed better with a 11.24% return vs 8.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLBR is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for ILF.

FLBR has the higher dividend yield at 5.66%, compared with 3.34% for ILF.

ILF tracks S&P Latin America 40 (Net), while FLBR tracks FTSE Brazil RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for ILF and 0.19% for FLBR.

ILF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ILF and FLBR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer