IRLNX vs. IMCDX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IRLNX (Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio) and IMCDX (Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund) are both mutual funds - IRLNX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Voya, while IMCDX is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund managed by Voya. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IRLNX charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IMCDX.

Performance

IRLNX vs. IMCDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio (IRLNX) and Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund (IMCDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

IRLNX

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: 8.00%
• YTD: 9.30%
• 6M: 8.71%
• 1Y: 28.96%
• 3Y*: 26.12%
• 5Y*: 17.02%
• 10Y*: 19.35%

IMCDX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IRLNX vs. IMCDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IRLNX Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio	9.30%	18.20%	34.60%	46.01%	-30.06%	30.63%	38.32%	35.61%	-2.02%	31.27%
IMCDX Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund	0.00%	0.00%	6.44%	8.51%	-13.79%	0.08%	8.35%	13.65%	-1.77%	9.40%

Correlation

The correlation between IRLNX and IMCDX is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.15
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.18
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2012	0.16

Return for Risk

IRLNX vs. IMCDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IRLNX

IRLNX Risk / Return Rank: 39
IRLNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
IRLNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
IRLNX Omega Ratio Rank: 45
IRLNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
IRLNX Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IRLNX vs. IMCDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio (IRLNX) and Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund (IMCDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IRLNX	IMCDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.08	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.90	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.02	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.36	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IRLNX	IMCDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.08	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.93	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	IRLNX	IMCDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.90%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.64%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.31%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.90%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.90%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.44%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.74%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.02%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IRLNX	IMCDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.14%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.26%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.23%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.00%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.45%	—	—

IRLNX vs. IMCDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IRLNX has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than IMCDX's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

IRLNX vs. IMCDX - Dividend Comparison

IRLNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.89%, while IMCDX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IMCDX Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund	0.00%	0.00%	4.08%	4.21%	3.80%	6.14%	4.64%	4.99%	5.30%	4.79%	5.22%	5.11%
IRLNX Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio	18.89%	9.54%	3.55%	4.60%	11.22%	0.83%	4.18%	4.95%	3.70%	0.99%	1.23%	1.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IRLNX and IMCDX in my portfolio?

IRLNX and IMCDX have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.