IMCDX vs. SITEX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

IMCDX (Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund) and SITEX (SEI Institutional International Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds. Their 0.57 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. IMCDX charges 0.10%/yr vs 1.36%/yr for SITEX.

Performance

IMCDX vs. SITEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund (IMCDX) and SEI Institutional International Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund (SITEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

IMCDX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

SITEX

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: -0.56%
• 6M: 0.97%
• YTD: 3.52%
• 1Y: 12.32%
• 3Y*: 9.57%
• 5Y*: 3.32%
• 10Y*: 3.27%
• ALL TIME*: 6.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
SITEX SEI Institutional International Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

IMCDX vs. SITEX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IMCDX Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund	0.00%	0.00%	6.44%	8.51%	-13.79%	0.08%	8.35%	13.65%	-1.77%	9.40%
SITEX SEI Institutional International Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund	3.52%	19.86%	2.65%	13.56%	-15.44%	-5.84%	4.04%	14.37%	-8.72%	14.26%

Correlation

The correlation between IMCDX and SITEX is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.43
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.55
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2012	0.57

The correlation between IMCDX and SITEX shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (3 years) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

IMCDX vs. SITEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IMCDX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SITEX

SITEX Risk / Return Rank: 81
SITEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
SITEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
SITEX Omega Ratio Rank: 87
SITEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
SITEX Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IMCDX vs. SITEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund (IMCDX) and SEI Institutional International Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund (SITEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IMCDX	SITEX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.16	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.37	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.44	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.31	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	8.79	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	IMCDX	SITEX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-45.23%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-5.56%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-6.89%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.05%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-28.92%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-1.07%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-6.58%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.44%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IMCDX	SITEX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.26%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	5.15%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	5.93%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	7.14%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	8.42%	—

IMCDX vs. SITEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMCDX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than SITEX's 1.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

IMCDX vs. SITEX - Dividend Comparison

IMCDX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SITEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.29%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IMCDX Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund	0.00%	0.00%	4.08%	4.21%	3.80%	6.14%	4.64%	4.99%	5.30%	4.79%	5.22%	5.11%
SITEX SEI Institutional International Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund	6.29%	6.27%	5.68%	5.16%	1.62%	3.43%	0.38%	2.18%	2.47%	3.90%	1.58%	0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IMCDX and SITEX in my portfolio?

IMCDX and SITEX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.