IRLNX vs. FCNTX
IRLNX (Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio) and FCNTX (Fidelity Contrafund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, IRLNX returned 17.76%/yr vs 16.85%/yr for FCNTX. Their correlation of 0.94 means they have usually moved in the same direction. IRLNX charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for FCNTX.
Performance
IRLNX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IRLNX achieves a -0.43% return, which is significantly lower than FCNTX's 5.62% return. Over the past 10 years, IRLNX has outperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of 17.76%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively lower 16.85% annualized return.
IRLNX
- 1D
- 3.13%
- 1M
- -3.43%
- 6M
- 1.28%
- YTD
- -0.43%
- 1Y
- 8.09%
- 3Y*
- 19.27%
- 5Y*
- 12.43%
- 10Y*
- 17.76%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.90%
FCNTX
- 1D
- 0.95%
- 1M
- -3.83%
- 6M
- 3.61%
- YTD
- 5.62%
- 1Y
- 13.75%
- 3Y*
- 22.98%
- 5Y*
- 13.11%
- 10Y*
- 16.85%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.46%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
IRLNX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IRLNX Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio | -0.43% | 18.20% | 34.60% | 46.01% | -30.06% | 30.63% | 38.32% | 35.61% | -2.02% | 31.27% |
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund | 5.62% | 21.76% | 36.00% | 38.67% | -28.31% | 24.52% | 32.48% | 30.00% | -3.81% | 32.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between IRLNX and FCNTX is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2009 | 0.94 |
The correlation between IRLNX and FCNTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (1 year) to 0.94 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IRLNX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank
IRLNX
FCNTX
IRLNX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio (IRLNX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IRLNX | FCNTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.16 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.53 | 1.19 | -0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.51 | 4.65 | -3.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IRLNX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IRLNX drawdown since its inception was -32.90%, smaller than the maximum FCNTX drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRLNX and FCNTX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IRLNX | FCNTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.90% | -49.19% | +16.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.64% | -11.30% | -5.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.31% | -19.75% | -3.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.90% | -32.59% | -0.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.90% | -32.59% | -0.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.30% | -5.29% | -4.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.75% | -8.14% | +3.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.62% | 2.89% | +2.73% |
Volatility
IRLNX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison
Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio (IRLNX) has a higher volatility of 6.77% compared to Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) at 3.84%. This indicates that IRLNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IRLNX | FCNTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.77% | 3.84% | +2.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.77% | 12.26% | +2.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.43% | 15.46% | +2.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.34% | 19.37% | +2.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.60% | 19.73% | +1.87% |
IRLNX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IRLNX has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
IRLNX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison
IRLNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.74%, more than FCNTX's 4.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund | 4.42% | 5.21% | 4.19% | 3.78% | 11.87% | 10.80% | 8.01% | 4.16% | 7.46% | 6.08% | 3.81% | 5.33% |
IRLNX Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio | 20.74% | 9.54% | 3.55% | 4.60% | 11.22% | 0.83% | 4.18% | 4.95% | 3.70% | 0.99% | 1.23% | 1.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IRLNX and FCNTX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IRLNX has higher volatility (6.77%) compared to FCNTX (3.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IRLNX dropped -32.90% vs FCNTX's -49.19%.
FCNTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IRLNX and FCNTX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer