PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
IIRLX vs. FCNTX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between IIRLX and FCNTX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.9

Performance

IIRLX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Russell Large Cap Index Portfolio (IIRLX) and Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
8.28%
5.53%
IIRLX
FCNTX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

IIRLX:

1.72

FCNTX:

1.35

Sortino Ratio

IIRLX:

2.33

FCNTX:

1.86

Omega Ratio

IIRLX:

1.32

FCNTX:

1.25

Calmar Ratio

IIRLX:

2.58

FCNTX:

2.02

Martin Ratio

IIRLX:

11.05

FCNTX:

6.99

Ulcer Index

IIRLX:

2.14%

FCNTX:

3.14%

Daily Std Dev

IIRLX:

13.80%

FCNTX:

16.23%

Max Drawdown

IIRLX:

-45.22%

FCNTX:

-48.74%

Current Drawdown

IIRLX:

-2.15%

FCNTX:

-3.82%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IIRLX achieves a 2.49% return, which is significantly lower than FCNTX's 3.66% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IIRLX having a 13.58% annualized return and FCNTX not far behind at 13.50%.


IIRLX

YTD

2.49%

1M

-1.06%

6M

8.28%

1Y

20.81%

5Y*

14.90%

10Y*

13.58%

FCNTX

YTD

3.66%

1M

-1.58%

6M

5.53%

1Y

18.61%

5Y*

15.24%

10Y*

13.50%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IIRLX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IIRLX has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.


FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund Fund
Expense ratio chart for FCNTX: current value at 0.39% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.39%
Expense ratio chart for IIRLX: current value at 0.36% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.36%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

IIRLX vs. FCNTX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IIRLX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IIRLX is 8585
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IIRLX is 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IIRLX is 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IIRLX is 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IIRLX is 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IIRLX is 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

FCNTX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FCNTX is 7373
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FCNTX is 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FCNTX is 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FCNTX is 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FCNTX is 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FCNTX is 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

IIRLX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Russell Large Cap Index Portfolio (IIRLX) and Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for IIRLX, currently valued at 1.72, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.721.35
The chart of Sortino ratio for IIRLX, currently valued at 2.33, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.331.86
The chart of Omega ratio for IIRLX, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.321.25
The chart of Calmar ratio for IIRLX, currently valued at 2.58, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.002.582.02
The chart of Martin ratio for IIRLX, currently valued at 11.05, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.0011.056.99
IIRLX
FCNTX

The current IIRLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IIRLX and FCNTX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.502.002.503.003.50SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.72
1.35
IIRLX
FCNTX

Dividends

IIRLX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

IIRLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, more than FCNTX's 0.06% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
IIRLX
Voya Russell Large Cap Index Portfolio
0.93%0.96%1.14%0.75%1.04%1.35%1.53%1.74%1.47%1.77%1.66%1.49%
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund Fund
0.06%0.08%0.48%13.65%10.80%8.01%4.16%9.14%5.54%0.30%0.31%7.55%

Drawdowns

IIRLX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IIRLX drawdown since its inception was -45.22%, smaller than the maximum FCNTX drawdown of -48.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IIRLX and FCNTX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-2.15%
-3.82%
IIRLX
FCNTX

Volatility

IIRLX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Voya Russell Large Cap Index Portfolio (IIRLX) is 3.64%, while Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX) has a volatility of 4.57%. This indicates that IIRLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
3.64%
4.57%
IIRLX
FCNTX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab