IRET vs. UCO

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

IRET (iREIT MarketVector Quality REIT Index ETF) and UCO (ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil) are both exchange-traded funds - IRET is a REIT fund tracking the iREIT MarketVector Quality REIT Index, while UCO is a Leveraged Commodities fund tracking the Dow Jones-UBS Crude Oil Sub-Index (200%). Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. IRET charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for UCO.

Performance

IRET vs. UCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iREIT MarketVector Quality REIT Index ETF (IRET) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

IRET

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UCO

• 1D: -3.09%
• 1M: 3.56%
• YTD: 131.94%
• 6M: 114.50%
• 1Y: 106.12%
• 3Y*: 23.38%
• 5Y*: 20.42%
• 10Y*: -12.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IRET vs. UCO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
IRET iREIT MarketVector Quality REIT Index ETF	14.33%	-0.94%	2.62%
UCO ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil	131.94%	-29.75%	-7.90%

Correlation

The correlation between IRET and UCO is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024	-0.08

Return for Risk

IRET vs. UCO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UCO

UCO Risk / Return Rank: 51
UCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
UCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
UCO Omega Ratio Rank: 48
UCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
UCO Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IRET vs. UCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iREIT MarketVector Quality REIT Index ETF (IRET) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IRET	UCO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.86	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.34	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.18	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	-0.35	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	IRET	UCO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-99.95%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-34.77%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-50.38%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-67.24%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-98.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-99.28%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-85.49%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	18.36%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IRET	UCO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	17.06%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	46.72%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	57.32%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	59.80%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	71.35%	—

IRET vs. UCO - Expense Ratio Comparison

IRET has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than UCO's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

IRET vs. UCO - Dividend Comparison

IRET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%, while UCO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
IRET iREIT MarketVector Quality REIT Index ETF	3.79%	5.14%	3.52%
UCO ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IRET and UCO in my portfolio?

IRET and UCO have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IRET or UCO?

On fees, IRET is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IRET or UCO?

IRET is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UCO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IRET or UCO?

IRET has the higher dividend yield at 3.79%, compared with 0.00% for UCO.

What is the main difference between IRET and UCO?

IRET is categorized as REIT, while UCO is Leveraged Commodities. IRET tracks iREIT MarketVector Quality REIT Index, while UCO tracks Dow Jones-UBS Crude Oil Sub-Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: iREIT and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for IRET and 0.95% for UCO.