IRET vs. BLDG
IRET (iREIT MarketVector Quality REIT Index ETF) and BLDG (Cambria Global Real Estate ETF) are both REIT funds. IRET is passively managed, while BLDG is actively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IRET charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for BLDG.
Performance
IRET vs. BLDG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IRET
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BLDG
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 1.97%
- YTD
- 9.76%
- 6M
- 10.36%
- 1Y
- 11.23%
- 3Y*
- 11.02%
- 5Y*
- 2.99%
- 10Y*
- —
IRET vs. BLDG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IRET iREIT MarketVector Quality REIT Index ETF | 14.33% | -0.94% | 2.95% |
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF | 9.76% | 4.26% | 12.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between IRET and BLDG is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2024 | 0.77 |
The correlation between IRET and BLDG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IRET vs. BLDG — Risk / Return Rank
IRET
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BLDG
IRET vs. BLDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iREIT MarketVector Quality REIT Index ETF (IRET) and Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IRET | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.17 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.12 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.92 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IRET vs. BLDG - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IRET | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -27.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -1.83% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -9.15% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.87% | — |
Volatility
IRET vs. BLDG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IRET | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.60% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.05% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 11.61% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 15.28% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 15.56% | — |
IRET vs. BLDG - Expense Ratio Comparison
IRET has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than BLDG's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
IRET vs. BLDG - Dividend Comparison
IRET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%, less than BLDG's 5.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF | 5.35% | 7.46% | 7.97% | 4.99% | 3.99% | 10.40% | 0.59% |
IRET iREIT MarketVector Quality REIT Index ETF | 3.79% | 5.14% | 3.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IRET and BLDG have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BLDG is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BLDG is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for IRET.
BLDG has the higher dividend yield at 5.35%, compared with 3.79% for IRET.
They also come from different issuers: iREIT and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for IRET and 0.59% for BLDG.
Find the right allocation for IRET and BLDG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer