IRET vs. BLDG

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

IRET (iREIT MarketVector Quality REIT Index ETF) and BLDG (Cambria Global Real Estate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IRET is a Quality Factor fund tracking the iREIT MarketVector Quality REIT Index, while BLDG is a REIT fund actively managed by Cambria. IRET is passively managed, while BLDG is actively managed. Their 0.74 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. IRET charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for BLDG.

Performance

IRET vs. BLDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iREIT MarketVector Quality REIT Index ETF (IRET) and Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

IRET

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

BLDG

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: 1.40%
• 6M: 9.72%
• YTD: 14.12%
• 1Y: 16.69%
• 3Y*: 10.18%
• 5Y*: 3.47%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF	$67.61K	$76.54K	$587.09K

IRET vs. BLDG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
IRET iREIT MarketVector Quality REIT Index ETF	14.33%	-0.94%	2.95%
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF	14.12%	4.26%	12.04%

Correlation

The correlation between IRET and BLDG is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2024	0.74

The correlation between IRET and BLDG shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.74 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

IRET vs. BLDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IRET

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BLDG

BLDG Risk / Return Rank: 48
BLDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
BLDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
BLDG Omega Ratio Rank: 49
BLDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
BLDG Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IRET vs. BLDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iREIT MarketVector Quality REIT Index ETF (IRET) and Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IRET	BLDG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.46	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.04	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.25	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.66	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	5.85	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	IRET	BLDG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-27.25%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.08%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.57%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-27.25%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-1.80%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-8.98%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.86%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IRET	BLDG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.81%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.61%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	11.52%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	15.23%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	15.50%	—

IRET vs. BLDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

IRET has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than BLDG's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

IRET vs. BLDG - Dividend Comparison

IRET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, less than BLDG's 5.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF	5.15%	7.46%	7.97%	4.99%	3.99%	10.40%	0.59%
IRET iREIT MarketVector Quality REIT Index ETF	3.04%	5.14%	3.52%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IRET and BLDG in my portfolio?

IRET and BLDG have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IRET or BLDG?

On fees, BLDG is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IRET or BLDG?

BLDG is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for IRET.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IRET or BLDG?

BLDG has the higher dividend yield at 5.15%, compared with 3.04% for IRET.

What is the main difference between IRET and BLDG?

IRET is categorized as Quality Factor, while BLDG is REIT. They also come from different issuers: Tidal and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for IRET and 0.59% for BLDG.