IRET vs. RDOG

Last updated Jul 22, 2026

IRET (iREIT MarketVector Quality REIT Index ETF) and RDOG (ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF) are both REIT funds - IRET tracks the iREIT MarketVector Quality REIT Index while RDOG tracks the S-Network REIT Dividend Dogs Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IRET charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for RDOG.

Performance

IRET vs. RDOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iREIT MarketVector Quality REIT Index ETF (IRET) and ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

IRET

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

RDOG

• 1D: 0.45%
• 1M: 4.84%
• 6M: 16.89%
• YTD: 21.50%
• 1Y: 25.09%
• 3Y*: 11.04%
• 5Y*: 2.91%
• 10Y*: 4.14%
• ALL TIME*: 4.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IRET vs. RDOG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
IRET iREIT MarketVector Quality REIT Index ETF	14.33%	-0.94%	2.95%
RDOG ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF	21.50%	0.95%	11.90%

Correlation

The correlation between IRET and RDOG is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2024	0.86

The correlation between IRET and RDOG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

IRET vs. RDOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IRET

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RDOG

RDOG Risk / Return Rank: 67
RDOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
RDOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
RDOG Omega Ratio Rank: 64
RDOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
RDOG Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IRET vs. RDOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iREIT MarketVector Quality REIT Index ETF (IRET) and ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IRET	RDOG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.70	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.48	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.29	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.51	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	8.13	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	IRET	RDOG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-67.59%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.02%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-21.40%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-35.52%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-49.35%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-0.48%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-12.18%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.09%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IRET	RDOG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.31%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.41%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	14.82%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	19.79%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	23.05%	—

IRET vs. RDOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

IRET has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than RDOG's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

IRET vs. RDOG - Dividend Comparison

IRET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.41%, less than RDOG's 6.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IRET iREIT MarketVector Quality REIT Index ETF	3.41%	5.14%	3.52%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RDOG ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF	6.01%	6.91%	6.11%	7.07%	5.25%	3.11%	5.12%	3.10%	3.13%	3.64%	3.66%	3.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IRET and RDOG in my portfolio?

IRET and RDOG have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IRET or RDOG?

On fees, RDOG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IRET or RDOG?

RDOG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for IRET.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IRET or RDOG?

RDOG has the higher dividend yield at 6.01%, compared with 3.41% for IRET.

What is the main difference between IRET and RDOG?

IRET tracks iREIT MarketVector Quality REIT Index, while RDOG tracks S-Network REIT Dividend Dogs Index. They also come from different issuers: iREIT and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for IRET and 0.35% for RDOG.