IRCZX vs. QUASX
IRCZX (AB International Small Cap Portfolio) and QUASX (AB Small Cap Growth Portfolio) are both mutual funds - IRCZX is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund managed by AllianceBernstein, while QUASX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by AllianceBernstein. Over the past 10 years, IRCZX returned 8.76%/yr vs 14.52%/yr for QUASX. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IRCZX charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.11%/yr for QUASX.
Performance
IRCZX vs. QUASX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IRCZX achieves a 13.06% return, which is significantly lower than QUASX's 18.82% return. Over the past 10 years, IRCZX has underperformed QUASX with an annualized return of 8.76%, while QUASX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.52% annualized return.
IRCZX
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- -0.32%
- YTD
- 13.06%
- 6M
- 16.08%
- 1Y
- 26.80%
- 3Y*
- 20.09%
- 5Y*
- 7.58%
- 10Y*
- 8.76%
QUASX
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 1.80%
- YTD
- 18.82%
- 6M
- 15.84%
- 1Y
- 31.59%
- 3Y*
- 16.22%
- 5Y*
- 2.80%
- 10Y*
- 14.52%
IRCZX vs. QUASX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IRCZX AB International Small Cap Portfolio | 13.06% | 34.96% | 7.69% | 13.19% | -20.89% | 12.49% | 8.23% | 19.37% | -17.67% | 32.14% |
QUASX AB Small Cap Growth Portfolio | 18.82% | 4.85% | 18.49% | 17.83% | -39.09% | 9.76% | 53.85% | 49.85% | -1.02% | 34.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between IRCZX and QUASX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016 | 0.68 |
The correlation between IRCZX and QUASX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IRCZX vs. QUASX — Risk / Return Rank
IRCZX
QUASX
IRCZX vs. QUASX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB International Small Cap Portfolio (IRCZX) and AB Small Cap Growth Portfolio (QUASX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IRCZX | QUASX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.23 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | 2.14 | +0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.65 | 7.92 | +1.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IRCZX | QUASX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.94 | 1.36 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.11 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.57 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.39 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
IRCZX vs. QUASX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IRCZX drawdown since its inception was -44.50%, smaller than the maximum QUASX drawdown of -60.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRCZX and QUASX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IRCZX | QUASX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.50% | -60.97% | +16.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.59% | -15.02% | +3.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.74% | -31.68% | +17.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.68% | -47.37% | +12.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.50% | -47.37% | +2.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.53% | -3.46% | +0.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.35% | -15.75% | +6.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 4.05% | -1.16% |
Volatility
IRCZX vs. QUASX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AB International Small Cap Portfolio (IRCZX) is 5.01%, while AB Small Cap Growth Portfolio (QUASX) has a volatility of 6.90%. This indicates that IRCZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QUASX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IRCZX | QUASX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.01% | 6.90% | -1.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.15% | 18.50% | -6.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.37% | 23.69% | -9.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.69% | 26.34% | -10.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.16% | 25.55% | -9.39% |
IRCZX vs. QUASX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IRCZX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than QUASX's 1.11% expense ratio.
Dividends
IRCZX vs. QUASX - Dividend Comparison
IRCZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.66%, while QUASX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IRCZX AB International Small Cap Portfolio | 13.66% | 15.44% | 2.70% | 2.95% | 1.07% | 3.88% | 1.14% | 1.96% | 10.24% | 3.79% | 2.72% | 0.00% |
QUASX AB Small Cap Growth Portfolio | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.07% | 9.86% | 18.20% | 19.70% | 9.29% | 2.32% | 9.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IRCZX and QUASX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QUASX has higher volatility (6.90%) compared to IRCZX (5.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IRCZX dropped -44.50% vs QUASX's -60.97%.
IRCZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IRCZX and QUASX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer