PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IRCZX vs. APGAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IRCZX vs. APGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB International Small Cap Portfolio (IRCZX) and AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class A (APGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IRCZX achieves a 13.06% return, which is significantly higher than APGAX's 4.69% return. Over the past 10 years, IRCZX has underperformed APGAX with an annualized return of 8.76%, while APGAX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.21% annualized return.


IRCZX

1D
-1.03%
1M
-0.32%
YTD
13.06%
6M
16.08%
1Y
26.80%
3Y*
20.09%
5Y*
7.58%
10Y*
8.76%

APGAX

1D
-0.86%
1M
2.47%
YTD
4.69%
6M
3.75%
1Y
14.32%
3Y*
18.73%
5Y*
10.71%
10Y*
16.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IRCZX vs. APGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IRCZX
AB International Small Cap Portfolio
13.06%34.96%7.69%13.19%-20.89%12.49%8.23%19.37%-17.67%32.14%
APGAX
AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class A
4.69%12.96%25.09%34.66%-28.96%28.60%34.05%33.77%1.97%31.36%

Correlation

The correlation between IRCZX and APGAX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.67

The correlation between IRCZX and APGAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IRCZX vs. APGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IRCZX
IRCZX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
IRCZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IRCZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
IRCZX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
IRCZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
IRCZX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

APGAX
APGAX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
APGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
APGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
APGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
APGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IRCZX vs. APGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB International Small Cap Portfolio (IRCZX) and AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class A (APGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IRCZXAPGAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.19

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

1.00

+1.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.65

3.69

+5.96

IRCZX vs. APGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IRCZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the APGAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IRCZX and APGAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IRCZXAPGAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94

1.07

+0.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.53

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.83

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.53

+0.02

Drawdowns

IRCZX vs. APGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IRCZX drawdown since its inception was -44.50%, smaller than the maximum APGAX drawdown of -67.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRCZX and APGAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IRCZXAPGAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.50%

-67.19%

+22.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.59%

-15.33%

+3.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.74%

-21.63%

+7.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.68%

-34.04%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.50%

-34.04%

-10.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.53%

-1.48%

-1.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.35%

-19.42%

+10.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

4.14%

-1.25%

Volatility

IRCZX vs. APGAX - Volatility Comparison

AB International Small Cap Portfolio (IRCZX) has a higher volatility of 5.01% compared to AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class A (APGAX) at 3.32%. This indicates that IRCZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IRCZXAPGAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.01%

3.32%

+1.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.15%

10.93%

+1.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.37%

14.37%

0.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.69%

20.16%

-4.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.16%

19.67%

-3.51%

IRCZX vs. APGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IRCZX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than APGAX's 0.84% expense ratio.


Dividends

IRCZX vs. APGAX - Dividend Comparison

IRCZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.66%, more than APGAX's 10.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
APGAX
AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class A
10.81%11.31%7.44%1.75%0.97%8.04%2.87%3.66%9.96%4.09%2.74%9.23%
IRCZX
AB International Small Cap Portfolio
13.66%15.44%2.70%2.95%1.07%3.88%1.14%1.96%10.24%3.79%2.72%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IRCZX and APGAX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IRCZX has higher volatility (5.01%) compared to APGAX (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IRCZX dropped -44.50% vs APGAX's -67.19%.

IRCZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IRCZX and APGAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer