PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQSU vs. QAI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQSU vs. QAI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Equity ETF (IQSU) and IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQSU achieves a 13.58% return, which is significantly higher than QAI's 9.46% return.


IQSU

1D
0.21%
1M
6.55%
YTD
13.58%
6M
14.50%
1Y
30.67%
3Y*
19.82%
5Y*
13.18%
10Y*

QAI

1D
0.30%
1M
2.80%
YTD
9.46%
6M
10.26%
1Y
16.98%
3Y*
10.41%
5Y*
4.76%
10Y*
3.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQSU vs. QAI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IQSU
IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Equity ETF
13.58%14.44%16.64%32.96%-22.10%30.53%28.24%1.24%
QAI
IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF
9.46%8.29%6.67%10.07%-8.68%-0.16%5.73%0.31%

Correlation

The correlation between IQSU and QAI is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2019

0.74

The correlation between IQSU and QAI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

IQSU vs. QAI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IQSU
QAI

Technology

34.0%
21.9%

Communication Services

15.0%
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

14.8%
7.3%

Financial Services

11.7%
19.5%

Industrials

6.8%
13.6%

Healthcare

6.2%
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
3.7%

Real Estate

2.8%
2.9%

Basic Materials

2.7%
5.3%

Energy

1.3%
3.7%

Utilities

1.2%
3.8%

Technology

IQSU
34.0%
QAI
21.9%

Communication Services

IQSU
15.0%
QAI
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

IQSU
14.8%
QAI
7.3%

Financial Services

IQSU
11.7%
QAI
19.5%

Industrials

IQSU
6.8%
QAI
13.6%

Healthcare

IQSU
6.2%
QAI
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

IQSU
3.5%
QAI
3.7%

Real Estate

IQSU
2.8%
QAI
2.9%

Basic Materials

IQSU
2.7%
QAI
5.3%

Energy

IQSU
1.3%
QAI
3.7%

Utilities

IQSU
1.2%
QAI
3.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQSU vs. QAI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQSU
IQSU Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
IQSU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQSU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQSU Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
IQSU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQSU Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

QAI
QAI Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
QAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
QAI Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
QAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
QAI Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQSU vs. QAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Equity ETF (IQSU) and IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IQSUQAIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.23

2.86

-0.63

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.02

4.06

-1.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.57

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

4.57

-1.82

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.19

18.90

-7.71

IQSU vs. QAI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQSU Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the QAI Sharpe Ratio of 2.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQSU and QAI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IQSUQAIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.23

2.86

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.73

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.58

+0.22

Drawdowns

IQSU vs. QAI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQSU drawdown since its inception was -31.29%, which is greater than QAI's maximum drawdown of -14.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQSU and QAI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQSUQAIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.29%

-14.95%

-16.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.18%

-3.71%

-7.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.96%

-7.78%

-13.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.76%

-14.32%

-12.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

0.00%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.99%

-2.57%

-3.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.74%

0.90%

+1.84%

Volatility

IQSU vs. QAI - Volatility Comparison

IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Equity ETF (IQSU) has a higher volatility of 3.66% compared to IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI) at 2.01%. This indicates that IQSU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QAI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQSUQAIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.66%

2.01%

+1.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.82%

4.91%

+4.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.84%

5.97%

+7.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.88%

6.56%

+11.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.68%

6.17%

+14.51%

IQSU vs. QAI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQSU has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than QAI's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

IQSU vs. QAI - Dividend Comparison

IQSU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than QAI's 1.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IQSU
IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Equity ETF
0.97%1.09%1.12%1.15%1.47%1.07%0.98%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QAI
IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF
1.37%1.50%2.22%4.08%2.00%0.28%1.98%1.91%1.90%0.00%0.00%0.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


IQSU and QAI have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IQSU has higher volatility (3.66%) compared to QAI (2.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IQSU dropped -31.29% vs QAI's -14.95%.

On 5-year performance, IQSU leads with 13.18% vs 4.76% for QAI. On fees, IQSU is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, QAI has been the lower-risk option at 2.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IQSU has performed better with a 13.18% return vs 4.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IQSU is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for QAI.

QAI has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.97% for IQSU.

IQSU is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QAI is Long-Short. IQSU tracks IQ Candriam ESG US Equity Index, while QAI tracks IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for IQSU and 0.79% for QAI.

QAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQSU and QAI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer