PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQSU vs. PWB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQSU vs. PWB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Equity ETF (IQSU) and Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQSU achieves a 13.06% return, which is significantly lower than PWB's 28.68% return.


IQSU

1D
-0.46%
1M
6.63%
YTD
13.06%
6M
13.30%
1Y
29.34%
3Y*
19.64%
5Y*
12.84%
10Y*

PWB

1D
0.22%
1M
10.94%
YTD
28.68%
6M
28.89%
1Y
45.84%
3Y*
34.49%
5Y*
18.36%
10Y*
18.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQSU vs. PWB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IQSU
IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Equity ETF
13.06%14.44%16.64%32.96%-22.10%30.53%28.24%1.24%
PWB
Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF
28.68%24.94%31.04%30.61%-25.81%19.58%31.89%1.01%

Correlation

The correlation between IQSU and PWB is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2019

0.88

The correlation between IQSU and PWB shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.90 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IQSU vs. PWB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IQSU
PWB

Technology

34.0%
44.6%

Communication Services

15.0%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

14.8%
5.2%

Financial Services

11.7%
10.3%

Industrials

6.8%
15.9%

Healthcare

6.2%
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
8.4%

Real Estate

2.8%

-

Basic Materials

2.7%
1.1%

Energy

1.3%

-

Utilities

1.2%
1.6%

Technology

IQSU
34.0%
PWB
44.6%

Communication Services

IQSU
15.0%
PWB
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

IQSU
14.8%
PWB
5.2%

Financial Services

IQSU
11.7%
PWB
10.3%

Industrials

IQSU
6.8%
PWB
15.9%

Healthcare

IQSU
6.2%
PWB
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

IQSU
3.5%
PWB
8.4%

Real Estate

IQSU
2.8%
PWB

-

Basic Materials

IQSU
2.7%
PWB
1.1%

Energy

IQSU
1.3%
PWB

-

Utilities

IQSU
1.2%
PWB
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQSU vs. PWB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQSU
IQSU Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
IQSU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQSU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQSU Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
IQSU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQSU Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

PWB
PWB Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
PWB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWB Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
PWB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWB Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQSU vs. PWB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Equity ETF (IQSU) and Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IQSUPWBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.42

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.64

3.80

-1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.74

16.42

-5.68

IQSU vs. PWB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQSU Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the PWB Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQSU and PWB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IQSUPWBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

2.50

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.88

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.61

+0.18

Drawdowns

IQSU vs. PWB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQSU drawdown since its inception was -31.29%, smaller than the maximum PWB drawdown of -52.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQSU and PWB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQSUPWBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.29%

-52.58%

+21.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.18%

-12.11%

+0.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.96%

-22.10%

+1.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.76%

-31.41%

+4.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

0.00%

-0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.99%

-8.23%

+2.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.74%

2.80%

-0.06%

Volatility

IQSU vs. PWB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Equity ETF (IQSU) is 3.64%, while Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB) has a volatility of 5.38%. This indicates that IQSU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PWB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQSUPWBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.64%

5.38%

-1.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.83%

15.00%

-5.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.85%

18.47%

-4.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.88%

20.99%

-3.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.68%

20.71%

-0.03%

IQSU vs. PWB - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQSU has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than PWB's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

IQSU vs. PWB - Dividend Comparison

IQSU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, while PWB has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IQSU
IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Equity ETF
0.97%1.09%1.12%1.15%1.47%1.07%0.98%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PWB
Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.08%0.37%0.31%0.04%0.21%0.58%0.97%0.54%0.82%0.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


IQSU and PWB have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PWB has higher volatility (5.38%) compared to IQSU (3.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IQSU dropped -31.29% vs PWB's -52.58%.

On 5-year performance, PWB leads with 18.36% vs 12.84% for IQSU. On fees, IQSU is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, IQSU has been the lower-risk option at 3.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PWB has performed better with a 18.36% return vs 12.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IQSU is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for PWB.

IQSU has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.00% for PWB.

IQSU tracks IQ Candriam ESG US Equity Index, while PWB tracks Dynamic Large Cap Growth Intellidex Index. They also come from different issuers: New York Life and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for IQSU and 0.56% for PWB.

PWB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQSU and PWB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer