IQQQ vs. SCHG
IQQQ (ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IQQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Daily Covered Call Index, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IQQQ returned 26.55% vs 13.64% for SCHG. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IQQQ charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.
Performance
IQQQ vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQQQ achieves a 12.97% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 0.90% return.
IQQQ
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- -4.09%
- YTD
- 12.97%
- 6M
- 11.34%
- 1Y
- 26.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHG
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- -6.40%
- YTD
- 0.90%
- 6M
- -0.53%
- 1Y
- 13.64%
- 3Y*
- 21.89%
- 5Y*
- 13.18%
- 10Y*
- 18.62%
IQQQ vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IQQQ ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 12.97% | 17.11% | 14.82% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.90% | 17.50% | 21.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQQQ and SCHG is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2024 | 0.95 |
The correlation between IQQQ and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQQQ vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
IQQQ
SCHG
IQQQ vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (IQQQ) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IQQQ | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.16 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | 0.87 | +1.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.28 | 2.82 | +5.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IQQQ vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQQQ drawdown since its inception was -20.41%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQQ and SCHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQQQ | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.41% | -34.59% | +14.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.13% | -16.41% | +5.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.13% | -6.87% | +1.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.63% | -5.20% | +1.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.28% | 5.07% | -1.79% |
Volatility
IQQQ vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (IQQQ) has a higher volatility of 8.24% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 5.98%. This indicates that IQQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQQQ | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.24% | 5.98% | +2.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.60% | 12.49% | +1.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.03% | 16.19% | +0.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.05% | 22.38% | -3.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.05% | 21.57% | -2.52% |
IQQQ vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQQQ has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQQQ vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
IQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.65%, more than SCHG's 0.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQQ ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 4.65% | 10.34% | 7.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.40% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, IQQQ and SCHG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IQQQ has higher volatility (8.24%) compared to SCHG (5.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IQQQ dropped -20.41% vs SCHG's -34.59%.
On 1-year performance, IQQQ leads with 26.55% vs 13.64% for SCHG. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHG has been the lower-risk option at 5.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IQQQ has performed better with a 26.55% return vs 13.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for IQQQ.
IQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.65%, compared with 0.40% for SCHG.
IQQQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. IQQQ tracks Nasdaq-100 Daily Covered Call Index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for IQQQ and 0.04% for SCHG.
IQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IQQQ and SCHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer