IQQQ vs. QRMI

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IQQQ (ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) and QRMI (Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. IQQQ is passively managed, while QRMI is actively managed. Over the past year, IQQQ returned 37.81% vs 9.82% for QRMI. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IQQQ charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QRMI.

Performance

IQQQ vs. QRMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (IQQQ) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQQQ achieves a 18.26% return, which is significantly higher than QRMI's 2.50% return.

IQQQ

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: 8.01%
• YTD: 18.26%
• 6M: 16.96%
• 1Y: 37.81%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QRMI

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 1.55%
• YTD: 2.50%
• 6M: 3.76%
• 1Y: 9.82%
• 3Y*: 7.03%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQQQ vs. QRMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
IQQQ ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	18.26%	17.11%	13.39%
QRMI Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF	2.50%	3.76%	9.65%

Correlation

The correlation between IQQQ and QRMI is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2024	0.74

The correlation between IQQQ and QRMI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

IQQQ vs. QRMI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IQQQ	QRMI
Technology	53.8%	53.8%
Communication Services	15.8%	15.8%
Consumer Cyclical	12.3%	12.2%
Consumer Defensive	7.7%	7.7%
Healthcare	4.2%	4.2%
Industrials	2.8%	2.8%
Utilities	1.4%	1.4%
Basic Materials	1.1%	1.1%
Energy	0.6%	0.6%
Financial Services	0.2%	0.2%
Real Estate	0.1%	0.1%

Return for Risk

IQQQ vs. QRMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQQQ

IQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 71
IQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
IQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
IQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 71
IQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
IQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 67

QRMI

QRMI Risk / Return Rank: 50
QRMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
QRMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
QRMI Omega Ratio Rank: 58
QRMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
QRMI Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQQQ vs. QRMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (IQQQ) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IQQQ	QRMI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.47	1.72	+0.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.21	2.33	+0.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.35	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.41	1.96	+1.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.12	8.60	+3.52
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IQQQ vs. QRMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQQQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is higher than the QRMI Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQQQ and QRMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IQQQ	QRMI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.47	1.72	+0.74
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.23	0.22	+1.01

Drawdowns

IQQQ vs. QRMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQQQ drawdown since its inception was -20.41%, roughly equal to the maximum QRMI drawdown of -20.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQQ and QRMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	IQQQ	QRMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.41%	-20.95%	+0.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.13%	-5.04%	-6.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-8.43%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.69%	-0.10%	-0.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.63%	-7.98%	+4.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.13%	1.14%	+1.99%

Volatility

IQQQ vs. QRMI - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (IQQQ) has a higher volatility of 3.97% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) at 0.67%. This indicates that IQQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QRMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IQQQ	QRMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.97%	0.67%	+3.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.52%	4.43%	+7.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.39%	5.72%	+9.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.55%	8.33%	+10.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.55%	8.33%	+10.22%

IQQQ vs. QRMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQQQ has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than QRMI's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

IQQQ vs. QRMI - Dividend Comparison

IQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.44%, less than QRMI's 12.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
IQQQ ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	4.44%	10.34%	7.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QRMI Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF	12.20%	12.28%	11.80%	12.44%	10.65%	3.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IQQQ and QRMI in my portfolio?

IQQQ and QRMI have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IQQQ or QRMI?

IQQQ has higher volatility (3.97%) compared to QRMI (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IQQQ dropped -20.41% vs QRMI's -20.95%.

Which ETF is better, IQQQ or QRMI?

On 1-year performance, IQQQ leads with 37.81% vs 9.82% for QRMI. On fees, IQQQ is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, QRMI has been the lower-risk option at 0.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IQQQ or QRMI?

Over the 1-year period, IQQQ has performed better with a 37.81% return vs 9.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IQQQ or QRMI?

IQQQ is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QRMI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IQQQ or QRMI?

QRMI has the higher dividend yield at 12.20%, compared with 4.44% for IQQQ.

What is the main difference between IQQQ and QRMI?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for IQQQ and 0.60% for QRMI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.