PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQQQ.DE vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQQQ.DE vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Global Water UCITS ETF (IQQQ.DE) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IQQQ.DE is traded in EUR, while SCHG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SCHG values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQQQ.DE achieves a -0.71% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 7.69% return. Over the past 10 years, IQQQ.DE has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 9.10%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.45% annualized return.


IQQQ.DE

1D
-0.44%
1M
-2.76%
YTD
-0.71%
6M
-1.95%
1Y
1.74%
3Y*
6.09%
5Y*
5.32%
10Y*
9.10%

SCHG

1D
0.00%
1M
5.12%
YTD
7.69%
6M
5.99%
1Y
22.19%
3Y*
21.70%
5Y*
16.68%
10Y*
18.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQQQ.DE vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IQQQ.DE
iShares Global Water UCITS ETF
-0.71%5.27%10.22%9.85%-16.58%42.81%4.77%38.59%-6.82%11.64%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
8.00%3.56%43.86%45.60%-27.58%37.70%27.67%39.09%3.27%12.31%

Correlation

The correlation between IQQQ.DE and SCHG is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2009

0.46

The correlation between IQQQ.DE and SCHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (3 years) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQQQ.DE vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQQQ.DE
IQQQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
IQQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQQQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQQQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
IQQQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQQQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQQQ.DE vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Water UCITS ETF (IQQQ.DE) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IQQQ.DESCHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.25

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.19

1.42

-1.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.49

4.12

-3.62

IQQQ.DE vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is lower than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQQQ.DE and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IQQQ.DESCHGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

1.41

-1.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.76

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.85

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.91

-0.42

Drawdowns

IQQQ.DE vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQQQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -48.04%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -31.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQQ.DE and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQQQ.DESCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.04%

-31.88%

-16.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.94%

-15.64%

+6.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.50%

-28.18%

+10.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.39%

-30.34%

+5.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.50%

-31.88%

-2.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.97%

-1.46%

-6.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.76%

-5.23%

-2.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.51%

5.40%

-1.89%

Volatility

IQQQ.DE vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global Water UCITS ETF (IQQQ.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.43% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 3.18%. This indicates that IQQQ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQQQ.DESCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.43%

3.18%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.83%

11.13%

-2.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.67%

15.84%

-4.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.47%

21.97%

-7.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.19%

21.86%

-6.67%

IQQQ.DE vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQQQ.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

IQQQ.DE vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

IQQQ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, more than SCHG's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IQQQ.DE
iShares Global Water UCITS ETF
1.65%1.56%1.12%1.31%1.17%1.88%1.16%1.55%2.08%1.76%1.85%1.79%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.36%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


IQQQ.DE and SCHG have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IQQQ.DE.

IQQQ.DE is categorized as Water Equities, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. IQQQ.DE tracks S&P Global Water, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IQQQ.DE and 0.04% for SCHG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQQQ.DE and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer