PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQQ6.DE vs. QYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQQ6.DE vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF (IQQ6.DE) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IQQ6.DE is traded in EUR, while QYLD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QYLD values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQQ6.DE achieves a 8.43% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 9.11% return. Over the past 10 years, IQQ6.DE has underperformed QYLD with an annualized return of 3.38%, while QYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 9.56% annualized return.


IQQ6.DE

1D
0.18%
1M
-0.06%
YTD
8.43%
6M
8.59%
1Y
9.23%
3Y*
6.05%
5Y*
1.95%
10Y*
3.38%

QYLD

1D
-0.14%
1M
2.08%
YTD
9.11%
6M
10.20%
1Y
21.62%
3Y*
10.74%
5Y*
9.44%
10Y*
9.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQQ6.DE vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IQQ6.DE
iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF
8.43%-2.51%5.91%6.19%-19.35%36.59%-17.05%24.57%-0.76%-1.81%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
9.11%-3.68%27.23%19.09%-14.06%18.67%-0.24%25.47%1.48%4.19%

Correlation

The correlation between IQQ6.DE and QYLD is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2013

0.33

The correlation between IQQ6.DE and QYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (3 years) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQQ6.DE vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQQ6.DE
IQQ6.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
IQQ6.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQQ6.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQQ6.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
IQQ6.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQQ6.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

QYLD
QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQQ6.DE vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF (IQQ6.DE) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IQQ6.DEQYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.43

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.20

4.99

-3.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.63

16.86

-13.23

IQQ6.DE vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQQ6.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQQ6.DE and QYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IQQ6.DEQYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

2.19

-1.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

0.62

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

0.58

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.62

-0.40

Drawdowns

IQQ6.DE vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQQ6.DE drawdown since its inception was -66.50%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -27.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQ6.DE and QYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQQ6.DEQYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.50%

-27.40%

-39.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.63%

-4.35%

-3.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.92%

-23.12%

+3.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.62%

-23.12%

-6.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.83%

-27.40%

-14.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.68%

-0.14%

-5.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.00%

-4.79%

-9.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.54%

1.29%

+1.25%

Volatility

IQQ6.DE vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF (IQQ6.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.78% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 1.61%. This indicates that IQQ6.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQQ6.DEQYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.78%

1.61%

+1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.20%

7.28%

+0.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.05%

9.91%

+1.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.51%

15.38%

-0.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.36%

16.63%

-0.27%

IQQ6.DE vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQQ6.DE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

IQQ6.DE vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

IQQ6.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, less than QYLD's 11.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IQQ6.DE
iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF
3.51%3.61%3.37%3.39%3.91%2.51%3.58%3.24%4.53%3.49%3.45%3.27%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
11.46%11.55%12.50%11.78%13.75%12.85%11.16%9.84%12.44%7.69%9.15%9.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


IQQ6.DE and QYLD have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IQQ6.DE is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IQQ6.DE is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QYLD.

IQQ6.DE is categorized as REIT, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. IQQ6.DE tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Dividend+, while QYLD tracks CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for IQQ6.DE and 0.60% for QYLD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQQ6.DE and QYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer