IQQ6.DE vs. IUSP.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF (IQQ6.DE) and iShares US Property Yield UCITS ETF (IUSP.DE).
IQQ6.DE and IUSP.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IQQ6.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Dividend+. It was launched on Oct 20, 2006. IUSP.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the JPM GBI-EM Global Diversified TR USD. It was launched on Jun 20, 2011. Both IQQ6.DE and IUSP.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IQQ6.DE or IUSP.DE.
Key characteristics
IQQ6.DE | IUSP.DE | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 10.11% | -0.70% |
1Y Return | 18.12% | 2.64% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 0.90% | 0.64% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 1.33% | -0.23% |
10Y Return (Ann) | 5.87% | 1.67% |
Sharpe Ratio | 1.47 | 0.39 |
Daily Std Dev | 14.00% | 6.96% |
Max Drawdown | -66.51% | -28.23% |
Current Drawdown | -7.24% | -6.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQQ6.DE and IUSP.DE is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
IQQ6.DE vs. IUSP.DE - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, IQQ6.DE achieves a 10.11% return, which is significantly higher than IUSP.DE's -0.70% return. Over the past 10 years, IQQ6.DE has outperformed IUSP.DE with an annualized return of 5.87%, while IUSP.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 1.67% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IQQ6.DE vs. IUSP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQQ6.DE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSP.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IQQ6.DE vs. IUSP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF (IQQ6.DE) and iShares US Property Yield UCITS ETF (IUSP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IQQ6.DE vs. IUSP.DE - Dividend Comparison
IQQ6.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%, more than IUSP.DE's 2.08% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF | 3.24% | 3.39% | 3.91% | 2.51% | 3.58% | 3.24% | 4.53% | 3.49% | 3.45% | 3.27% | 3.44% | 4.08% |
iShares US Property Yield UCITS ETF | 2.08% | 4.32% | 7.55% | 5.13% | 6.22% | 6.11% | 6.67% | 6.43% | 6.34% | 4.38% | 0.98% | 0.85% |
Drawdowns
IQQ6.DE vs. IUSP.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQQ6.DE drawdown since its inception was -66.51%, which is greater than IUSP.DE's maximum drawdown of -28.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQ6.DE and IUSP.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IQQ6.DE vs. IUSP.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF (IQQ6.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.04% compared to iShares US Property Yield UCITS ETF (IUSP.DE) at 2.42%. This indicates that IQQ6.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUSP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.