IQM vs. FMTM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IQM (Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF) and FMTM (MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IQM is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while FMTM is a Momentum fund. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, IQM returned 75.07% vs 63.62% for FMTM. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IQM charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FMTM.

Performance

IQM vs. FMTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQM achieves a 40.18% return, which is significantly higher than FMTM's 31.75% return.

IQM

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: 11.94%
• YTD: 40.18%
• 6M: 38.57%
• 1Y: 75.07%
• 3Y*: 37.62%
• 5Y*: 22.22%
• 10Y*: —

FMTM

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: 6.28%
• YTD: 31.75%
• 6M: 34.74%
• 1Y: 63.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQM vs. FMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IQM Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF	40.18%	47.24%
FMTM MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF	31.75%	27.90%

Correlation

The correlation between IQM and FMTM is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2025	0.72

The correlation between IQM and FMTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

IQM vs. FMTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQM

IQM Risk / Return Rank: 78
IQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
IQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
IQM Omega Ratio Rank: 71
IQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
IQM Martin Ratio Rank: 83

FMTM

FMTM Risk / Return Rank: 82
FMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
FMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
FMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 76
FMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
FMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQM vs. FMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IQM	FMTM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.67	2.80	-0.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.11	3.43	-0.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.46	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.13	5.28	-0.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.79	20.62	-3.83
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IQM vs. FMTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQM Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is comparable to the FMTM Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQM and FMTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IQM	FMTM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.67	2.80	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.96	2.38	-1.42

Drawdowns

IQM vs. FMTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQM drawdown since its inception was -44.91%, which is greater than FMTM's maximum drawdown of -12.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQM and FMTM.

Drawdown Indicators

	IQM	FMTM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.91%	-12.12%	-32.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.71%	-12.12%	-2.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.42%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.91%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.37%	0.00%	-0.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.25%	-1.89%	-10.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.49%	3.10%	+1.39%

Volatility

IQM vs. FMTM - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) has a higher volatility of 9.20% compared to MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM) at 6.52%. This indicates that IQM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IQM	FMTM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.20%	6.52%	+2.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.92%	17.83%	+5.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.27%	22.82%	+5.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.91%	22.94%	+5.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.72%	22.94%	+7.78%

IQM vs. FMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FMTM's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

IQM vs. FMTM - Dividend Comparison

IQM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FMTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FMTM MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF	0.22%	0.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IQM Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.17%	0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IQM and FMTM in my portfolio?

IQM and FMTM have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IQM or FMTM?

IQM has higher volatility (9.20%) compared to FMTM (6.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IQM dropped -44.91% vs FMTM's -12.12%.

Which ETF is better, IQM or FMTM?

On 1-year performance, IQM leads with 75.07% vs 63.62% for FMTM. On fees, FMTM is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, FMTM has been the lower-risk option at 6.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IQM or FMTM?

Over the 1-year period, IQM has performed better with a 75.07% return vs 63.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IQM or FMTM?

FMTM is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IQM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IQM or FMTM?

FMTM has the higher dividend yield at 0.22%, compared with 0.00% for IQM.

What is the main difference between IQM and FMTM?

IQM is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FMTM is Momentum. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IQM and 0.45% for FMTM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FMTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.