IQM vs. BIBL

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL).

IQM and BIBL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IQM is an actively managed fund by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Feb 25, 2020. BIBL is a passively managed fund by Inspire that tracks the performance of the Inspire 100 Index. It was launched on Oct 30, 2017.

Performance

IQM vs. BIBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

IQM vs. BIBL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
IQM Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF	3.20%	30.76%	31.03%	41.06%	-33.36%	25.18%	78.48%
BIBL Inspire 100 ETF	6.10%	17.27%	12.49%	17.87%	-23.26%	27.44%	29.12%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQM achieves a 3.20% return, which is significantly lower than BIBL's 6.10% return.

IQM

• 1D: 1.99%
• 1M: -3.98%
• YTD: 3.20%
• 6M: 2.05%
• 1Y: 57.05%
• 3Y*: 26.96%
• 5Y*: 15.40%
• 10Y*: —

BIBL

• 1D: 1.12%
• 1M: -4.41%
• YTD: 6.10%
• 6M: 7.52%
• 1Y: 25.37%
• 3Y*: 16.16%
• 5Y*: 8.37%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQM vs. BIBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BIBL's 0.35% expense ratio.

IQM

Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF

BIBL

Inspire 100 ETF

Return for Risk

IQM vs. BIBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQM

IQM Risk / Return Rank: 87
IQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
IQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
IQM Omega Ratio Rank: 81
IQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
IQM Martin Ratio Rank: 90

BIBL

BIBL Risk / Return Rank: 70
BIBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
BIBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
BIBL Omega Ratio Rank: 68
BIBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
BIBL Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQM vs. BIBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IQM	BIBL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.72	1.25	+0.47
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.33	1.78	+0.54
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.26	+0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.00	1.84	+2.16
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.47	8.69	+3.78
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IQM vs. BIBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQM Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is higher than the BIBL Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQM and BIBL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IQM	BIBL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.72	1.25	+0.47
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54	0.43	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.78	0.54	+0.25

Correlation

The correlation between IQM and BIBL is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

IQM vs. BIBL - Dividend Comparison

IQM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BIBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IQM Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.17%	0.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BIBL Inspire 100 ETF	1.11%	1.01%	0.92%	1.02%	0.98%	17.87%	1.67%	1.30%	1.49%	0.31%

Drawdowns

IQM vs. BIBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQM drawdown since its inception was -44.91%, which is greater than BIBL's maximum drawdown of -36.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQM and BIBL.

Drawdown Indicators

	IQM	BIBL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.91%	-36.12%	-8.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.71%	-13.93%	-0.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.91%	-30.85%	-14.06%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.86%	-4.96%	-1.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.55%	-7.17%	-5.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.72%	2.95%	+1.77%

Volatility

IQM vs. BIBL - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) has a higher volatility of 12.71% compared to Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL) at 6.82%. This indicates that IQM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IQM	BIBL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.71%	6.82%	+5.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.53%	12.28%	+11.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.40%	20.39%	+13.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.67%	19.44%	+9.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.73%	21.15%	+9.58%