IQLT vs. SPYV
IQLT (iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF) and SPYV (SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IQLT is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI World ex USA Sector Neutral Quality Index (Net), while SPYV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IQLT returned 10.17%/yr vs 12.08%/yr for SPYV. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IQLT charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYV.
Performance
IQLT vs. SPYV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQLT achieves a 9.81% return, which is significantly higher than SPYV's 8.25% return. Over the past 10 years, IQLT has underperformed SPYV with an annualized return of 10.17%, while SPYV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.08% annualized return.
IQLT
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 1.57%
- YTD
- 9.81%
- 6M
- 11.22%
- 1Y
- 18.29%
- 3Y*
- 14.25%
- 5Y*
- 7.32%
- 10Y*
- 10.17%
SPYV
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 1.59%
- YTD
- 8.25%
- 6M
- 8.02%
- 1Y
- 21.87%
- 3Y*
- 15.13%
- 5Y*
- 10.98%
- 10Y*
- 12.08%
IQLT vs. SPYV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQLT iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF | 9.81% | 25.42% | 1.54% | 18.73% | -15.22% | 12.94% | 12.48% | 28.18% | -10.76% | 24.04% |
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 8.25% | 13.18% | 12.24% | 22.20% | -5.28% | 24.91% | 1.38% | 31.70% | -9.01% | 15.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQLT and SPYV is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2015 | 0.67 |
The correlation between IQLT and SPYV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
IQLT vs. SPYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IQLT
SPYV
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
IQLT
SPYV
Industrials
IQLT
SPYV
Technology
IQLT
SPYV
Healthcare
IQLT
SPYV
Consumer Cyclical
IQLT
SPYV
Basic Materials
IQLT
SPYV
Consumer Defensive
IQLT
SPYV
Energy
IQLT
SPYV
Utilities
IQLT
SPYV
Communication Services
IQLT
SPYV
Real Estate
IQLT
SPYV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQLT vs. SPYV — Risk / Return Rank
IQLT
SPYV
IQLT vs. SPYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IQLT | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.37 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.63 | 3.33 | -1.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.18 | 12.73 | -6.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IQLT vs. SPYV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQLT drawdown since its inception was -32.21%, smaller than the maximum SPYV drawdown of -58.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQLT and SPYV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQLT | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.21% | -58.45% | +26.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.38% | -6.22% | -4.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.18% | -17.54% | +4.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.24% | -17.89% | -12.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.21% | -36.89% | +4.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.04% | -0.18% | +0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.21% | -8.71% | +2.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.74% | 1.63% | +1.11% |
Volatility
IQLT vs. SPYV - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT) has a higher volatility of 5.41% compared to SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) at 2.70%. This indicates that IQLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQLT | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.41% | 2.70% | +2.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.72% | 7.26% | +5.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.00% | 9.97% | +5.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.55% | 14.42% | +2.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.00% | 16.94% | +0.06% |
IQLT vs. SPYV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQLT has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYV's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQLT vs. SPYV - Dividend Comparison
IQLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, more than SPYV's 1.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQLT iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF | 2.12% | 2.33% | 2.87% | 2.27% | 3.14% | 2.24% | 1.61% | 2.28% | 2.72% | 2.36% | 2.91% | 2.78% |
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 1.68% | 1.77% | 2.29% | 1.75% | 2.22% | 2.10% | 2.38% | 2.25% | 2.97% | 2.77% | 2.39% | 2.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IQLT and SPYV have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IQLT has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to SPYV (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IQLT dropped -32.21% vs SPYV's -58.45%.
On 10-year performance, SPYV leads with 12.08% vs 10.17% for IQLT. On fees, SPYV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYV has been the lower-risk option at 2.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPYV has performed better with a 12.08% return vs 10.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IQLT.
IQLT has the higher dividend yield at 2.12%, compared with 1.68% for SPYV.
IQLT is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while SPYV is S&P 500. IQLT tracks MSCI World ex USA Sector Neutral Quality Index (Net), while SPYV tracks S&P 500 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IQLT and 0.04% for SPYV.
SPYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IQLT and SPYV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer